x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Reviews
- Adolescent healthRemove Adolescent health filter
- Open AccessRemove Open Access filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2014 and 2021.
Author
- Acharya, Rajib1
- Adebayo, Emmanuel1
- Astone, Nan1
- Azzopardi, Peter S1
- Ba, Mariame Guèye1
- Blum, Robert W1
- Carvajal, Liliana1
- Covarrubias, Laura1
- Decker, Michele R1
- Delany-Moretlwe, Sinead1
- Emerson, Mark1
- Fagan, Lucy1
- Friedman, Howard S1
- Gao, Ersheng1
- Guthold, Regina1
- Hagell, Ann1
- Kalamar, Amanda1
- Marsh, Andrew D1
- Marshall, Beth Dail1
- Mashimbye, Lawrence1
- Moller, Ann-Beth1
- Morgan, Alison1
- Newby, Holly1
- Ojengbede, Oladosu1
- Olumide, Adesola1
Reviews
2 Results
- Review articleOpen Access
A Scoping Review of Adolescent Health Indicators
Journal of Adolescent HealthVol. 69Issue 3p365–374Published online: July 13, 2021- Holly Newby
- Andrew D. Marsh
- Ann-Beth Moller
- Emmanuel Adebayo
- Peter S. Azzopardi
- Liliana Carvajal
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 5A host of recent initiatives relating to adolescent health have been accompanied by varying indicator recommendations, with little stakeholder coordination. We assessed currently included adolescent health–related indicators for their measurement focus, identified overlap across initiatives, and determined measurement gaps. - Review article
Respondent-Driven Sampling for an Adolescent Health Study in Vulnerable Urban Settings: A Multi-Country Study
Journal of Adolescent HealthVol. 55Issue 6SupplementS6–S12Published in issue: December, 2014- Michele R. Decker
- Beth Dail Marshall
- Mark Emerson
- Amanda Kalamar
- Laura Covarrubias
- Nan Astone
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 34The global adolescent population is larger than ever before and is rapidly urbanizing. Global surveillance systems to monitor youth health typically use household- and school-based recruitment methods. These systems risk not reaching the most marginalized youth made vulnerable by conditions of migration, civil conflict, and other forms of individual and structural vulnerability. We describe the methodology of the Well-Being of Adolescents in Vulnerable Environments survey, which used respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to recruit male and female youth aged 15–19 years and living in economically distressed urban settings in Baltimore, MD; Johannesburg, South Africa; Ibadan, Nigeria; New Delhi, India; and Shanghai, China (migrant youth only) for a cross-sectional study.