Advertisement

Crush: A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Impact of a Mobile Health App on Adolescent Sexual Health

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Mobile technology allows delivery of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information directly to youth. We tested the efficacy of Crush, a mobile application aimed at improving sexual health by promoting the use of SRH services and contraception among female adolescents.

      Methods

      We recruited 1,210 women aged 14–18 years through social media advertising and randomized them into a Crush intervention group and a control group that received a wellness app. At 3 and 6 months post randomization, we compared changes from baseline in behaviors, attitudes, self-efficacy, perceived social norms, birth control knowledge, perceived control and use intentions, and SRH service utilization. Odds ratios were estimated with multivariable logistic regression and adjusted for baseline outcome, age, race/ethnicity, mother's education, and sexual experience.

      Results

      There was no difference in accessing SRH services according to study group. Three months post baseline, Crush users had higher odds (p < .05) than control participants of reporting confidence in accessing SRH services (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–2.3) and of believing that it is a good thing to use birth control consistently (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4–3.8). Six months after baseline, Crush users had higher odds than control participants of reporting they can control whether birth control is used every time they have sex (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2–2.6) and perceiving they would get pregnant if they did not use birth control (aOR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.2). Impacts on other behavioral constructs were also found.

      Discussion

      Crush was associated with improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy related to key SRH behaviors and may be a strategy to deliver SRH education to adolescent women. Studies including larger numbers of sexually active adolescents are needed to demonstrate behavioral impacts.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Osterman M.J.K.
        • Driscoll A.K.
        • et al.
        Births: Final data for 2019.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021; 70: 1-51
        • Center for Disease Control and Prevention
        Sexually transmitted Disease Surveillance 2016.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA2017
        • Hall K.S.
        • Sales J.M.
        • Komro K.A.
        • Santelli J.
        The state of sex education in the United States.
        J Adolesc Health. 2016; 58: 595
        • Brayboy L.M.
        • Mccoy K.
        • Thamotharan S.
        • et al.
        The use of technology in the sexual health education especially among minority adolescent girls in the United States.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 30: 305-309
        • Pound P.
        • Langford R.
        • Campbell R.
        What do young people think about their school-based sex and relationship education?: A qualitative synthesis of young people’s views and experiences.
        BMJ Open. 2016; 6: 1-14
        • Wartella E.
        • Rideout V.
        • Montague H.
        • et al.
        Teens, health and technology: A national survey.
        Media Commun. 2016; 4: 13-23
        • Gray N.J.
        • Klein J.D.
        • Noyce P.R.
        • et al.
        Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: The place of the internet.
        Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60: 1467-1478
        • Kachur R.
        • Mesnick J.
        • Liddon N.
        • et al.
        Adolescents, technology and reducing risk for HIV. STDs and Pregnancy.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA2013
        • Lenhart A.
        • Page D.
        Teens, social media & technology overview 2015.
        Pew Research Center, Washington, DC2015
        • West J.H.
        • Hall P.C.
        • Hanson C.L.
        • et al.
        There’s an app for that: Content analysis of paid health and fitness apps.
        J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14: e72
        • Zhao J.
        • Freeman B.
        • Li M.
        Can mobile phone apps influence people’s health behavior change?: An evidence review.
        J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18: e287
        • Rodrigues A.M.
        • Sniehotta F.F.
        • Birch-Machin M.A.
        • et al.
        Systematic and iterative development of a smartphone app to promote sun-protection among oolidaymakers: Design of a prototype and results of usability and acceptability testing.
        JMIR Res Protoc. 2017; 6: e112
        • Payne H.E.
        • Lister C.
        • West J.H.
        • Bernhardt J.M.
        Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: A systematic review of the literature.
        JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2015; 3: e20
        • Levine D.
        • McCright J.
        • Dobkin L.
        • et al.
        SEXINFO: A sexual health text messaging service for San Francisco youth.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 393-395
        • Antonishak J.
        • Kaye K.
        • Swiader L.
        Impact of an online birth control support network on unintended pregnancy.
        Soc Mar Q. 2015; 21: 23-36
        • Tebb K.P.
        • Trieu S.L.
        • Rico R.
        • et al.
        A mobile health contraception decision support intervention for Latina adolescents: Implementation evaluation for use in school-based health centers.
        JMIR MHealth and UHealth. 2019; 7: e11163
        • Downs J.S.
        • Ashcraft A.M.
        • Murray P.J.
        • et al.
        Video intervention to increase perceived self-efficacy for condom use in a randomized controlled trial of female adolescents.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018; 31: 291-298
        • Gilliam M.L.
        • Martins S.L.
        • Bartlett E.
        • et al.
        Development and testing of an iOS waiting room “app” for contraceptive counseling in a Title X family planning clinic.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211: 481.e1
        • Kalke K.M.
        • Ginossar T.
        • Shah S.F.
        • West A.J.
        Sex ed to go: A content analysis of comprehensive sexual education apps.
        Health Educ Behav. 2018; 45: 581-590
        • DHHS
        Code of Federal Regulation 45-Part 46 (45 CFR 46).
        Office for Human research protections, Washington, DC2009 (Available at:)
        • Santelli J.S.
        • Rosenfeld W.D.
        • DuRant R.H.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for adolescent health research: A position paper of the society for adolescent medicine.
        J Adolesc Health. 1995; 17: 270-276
        • Montano D.E.
        • Danuta K.
        Theory of Reasoned action, theory of Planned behaviour and the Integrated behaviour model.
        in: Glanz Karen Rimer B. Lewis F.M. Health Behavior: Theory Research and Practice. 3rd ed. Joseey-Bass, San Francisco, CA2002: 67-98
        • Teasdale J.D.
        Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change?.
        Adv Behav Res Ther. 1978; 1: 211-215
        • Webb T.L.
        • Joseph J.
        • Yardley L.
        • Michie S.
        Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy.
        J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12: e4
        • Downing S.G.
        • Cashman C.
        • Mcnamee H.
        • et al.
        Increasing chlamydia test of re-infection rates using SMS reminders and incentives.
        Sex Transm Infect. 2013; 89: 16-19
        • Manlove J.
        • Cook E.
        • Whitfield B.
        • et al.
        Short-term impacts of pulse: An app-based teen pregnancy prevention program for Black and Latinx women.
        J Adolesc Health. 2020; 66: 224-232
        • Center for HIV N.
        • Hepatitis V.
        • Prevention T.
        • et al.
        Youth risk behavior survey data: summary and trends report 2007-2017.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA2007
        • Mathieu E.
        • McGeechan K.
        • Barratt A.
        • Herbert R.
        Internet-based randomized controlled trials: A systematic review.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20: 568-576