Increased Parent Support for Comprehensive Sexuality Education Over 15 Years



      Comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) has been shown to reduce sexual risk-taking behaviors and promote healthy sexual development, and studies have shown high support for this approach. However, the past decade has seen many changes in the political landscape and social controversies. The present study reports on an updated survey and analysis of changes in support from 2006 to 2021.


      Survey data were collected by telephone in 2006 (N = 1,605) and online and in-person in 2021 (N = 719) from separate samples of Minnesota parents of school-age children. Parents responded to items regarding preferences for CSE, support for teaching numerous specific sexuality education topics, and the grade level at which topics should be introduced. Chi-square tests and logistic regression (with weighted 2021 data) were used to detect differences in support between survey years and across demographic and personal characteristics.


      At both time points, approximately 90% of parents thought that CSE should be taught in schools, with significant increases in support within several demographic categories. Support for including all specific topics was high, including for topics typically considered highly controversial (e.g., gender identity, 68.7%; abortion, 77.7% in 2021). Parents endorsed introducing most topics in elementary or middle school years.


      Findings suggest that policy makers and educators in Minnesota can be confident of strong parental support for CSE covering a wide range of content to meet students’ needs. Advocacy and action to advance the use of national sexuality education standards are in keeping with the views of the overwhelming majority of parents of school-age children.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Family and Youth Services Bureau
        An Office of the Administration for children and families. Sex Risk Avoidance Education Program [Internet].
        (Available at:)
        • Trenholm C.
        • Devaney B.
        • Forstson K.
        • et al.
        Impacts of abstinence education on teen sexual activity, risk of pregnancy, and risk of sexually transmitted diseases.
        J Policy Anal Manage. 2008; 27: 255-276
        • Chin H.
        • Sipe T.
        • Elder R.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of group-based comprehensive risk-reduction and abstinence education interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of adolescent pregnancy, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and sexually transmitted infections two systematic reviews for the Gu.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: 272-294
        • Guttmacher Institute
        A definition of comprehensive sexuality education [Internet].
        (Available at:)
        • Future of Sex Education Initiative
        National sex education standards: Core content and skills, K-12.
        2nd ed. Future of Sex Education Initiative, Washington (DC)2020
        • Kohler P.K.
        • Manhart L.E.
        • Lafferty W.E.
        Abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education and the initiation of sexual activity and teen pregnancy.
        J Adolesc Health. 2008; 42: 344-351
        • Rabbitte M.
        • Enriquez M.
        The role of policy on sexual health education in schools: Review.
        J Sch Nurs. 2019; 35: 27-38
      1. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Adolescent Health. Healthy people 2030: Increase the proportion of adolescents who get formal sex education before age 18 years — FP-08.

        • Atkins D.N.
        • Bradford W.D.
        The effect of state - level sex education policies on youth sexual behaviors.
        Arch Sex Behav. 2021; 50: 2321-2333
        • Goldfarb E.S.
        • Lieberman L.D.
        Three decades of research : The case for comprehensive sex education.
        J Adolesc Health. 2021; 68: 13-27
        • Lindberg L.D.
        • Kantor L.M.
        Adolescents’ receipt of sex education in a nationally representative sample, 2011-2019.
        J Adolesc Health. 2022; 70: 290-297
        • Eisenberg M.E.
        • Bernat D.H.
        • Bearinger L.H.
        • Resnick M.D.
        Support for comprehensive sexuality education: Perspectives from parents of school-age youth.
        J Adolesc Health. 2008; 42: 352-359
        • Kershner S.H.
        • Corwin S.
        • Prince M.
        • et al.
        Support for comprehensive sexuality education and adolescent access to condoms and contraception in South Carolina.
        Am J Sex Educ. 2017; 12: 297-314
        • Cameron A.
        • Smith E.
        • Mercer N.
        • Sundstrom B.
        ‘It is our duty:’ understanding parents’ perspectives on reproductive and sexual health education.
        Sex Educ. 2020; 20: 535-551
        • Kantor L.
        • Levitz N.
        • Holstrom A.
        • et al.
        Support for sex education and teenage pregnancy prevention programmes in the USA: Results from a national survey of likely voters voters.
        Sex Educ. 2020; 20: 239-251
        • Barr E.
        • Moore M.
        • Johnson T.
        • et al.
        New evidence: Data documenting parental support for earlier sexuality education.
        J Sch Health. 2014; 84: 10-17
        • Fisher C.M.
        • Telljohann S.K.
        • Price J.
        • Dake J.A.
        Perceptions of elementary school children’s parents regarding sexuality education.
        Am J Sex Educ. 2015; 10: 1-20
        • Dent L.
        • Maloney P.
        Evangelical Christian parents’ attitudes towards abstinence- based sex education: ‘I want my kids to have great sex!’.
        Sex Educ. 2017; 17: 149-164
        • Kantor L.
        • Levitz N.
        Parents’ views on sex education in schools: How much do democrats and republicans agree.
        PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0180250
        • Smith T.W.
        • Son J.
        General Social Survey 2012 Final Report: Trends in public attitudes about sexual morality.
        NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago (IL)2013 (60603(April))
        • Eisenberg M.E.
        • Bernat D.H.
        • Bearinger L.H.
        • Resnick M.D.
        Condom provision and education in Minnesota public schools: A telephone survey of parents.
        J Sch Health. 2009; 79 (quiz 438–439): 416-424
        • Bernat D.H.
        • Harpin S.B.
        • Eisenberg M.E.
        • et al.
        Parental support for the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.
        J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45: 525-527
        • Lagus K.A.
        • Bernat D.H.
        • Bearinger L.H.
        • et al.
        Parental perspectives on sources of sex information for young people.
        J Adolesc Health. 2011; 49: 87-89
        • Olson K.
        • Smyth J.
        • Horwitz R.
        • et al.
        Transitions from telephone surveys to self-administered and mixed-mode surveys: AAPOR Task Force report.
        J Surv Stat Methodol. 2021; 9: 381-411
        • Dillman D.A.
        Moving survey methodology forward in our rapidly changing world: A commentary.
        J Rural Soc Sci. 2016; 31: 160-174
      2. Minnesota U of. D2D: The driven to discover research facility [Internet].
        (Available at:)
        Date: 2020
        Date accessed: September 10, 2022
        • Constantine N.
        • Jerman P.
        • Huang A.
        California parents’ preferences and beliefs on school-based sexuality education policy.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007; 39: 167-175
        • Lindley L.
        • Reininger B.
        • Vincent M.
        • et al.
        Support for school-based sexuality education among South Carolina voters.
        J Sch Health. 1998; 68: 205-212
        • Zogby International
        Parents’ reactions to proposed sex education messages in the classroom.
        Zogby International, Washington (DC)2003
      3. U.S. Census Bureau. Census ZIP code Tabulation areas.

      4. NCES EDGE. Locale Curr.

      5. Environmental Systems Research Institute. ArcGIS online.

        • Seaman S.
        • White I.
        Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data.
        Stat Methods Med Res. 2013; 22: 278-295
        • Little R.
        Survey nonresponse adjustments for estimates of means.
        Int Stat Rev. 1986; 54: 139-157
        • Krishnakumar P.
        This record-breaking year for anti-transgender legislation would affect minors the most., 2021