Advertisement

Religious Variations in Perceived Infertility and Inconsistent Contraceptive Use Among Unmarried Young Adults in the United States

      Abstract

      Purpose

      In this paper, we examine associations among personal religiosity, perceived infertility, and inconsistent contraceptive use among unmarried young adults (ages 18–29).

      Methods

      The data for this investigation came from the National Survey of Reproductive and Contraceptive Knowledge (n = 1,695). We used multinomial logistic regression to model perceived infertility, adjusted probabilities to model rationales for perceived infertility, and binary logistic regression to model inconsistent contraceptive use.

      Results

      Evangelical Protestants were more likely than non-affiliates to believe that they were infertile. Among the young women who indicated some likelihood of infertility, evangelical Protestants were also more likely than their other Protestant or non–Christian faith counterparts to believe that they were infertile because they had unprotected sex without becoming pregnant. Although evangelical Protestants were more likely to exhibit inconsistent contraception use than non-affiliates, we were unable to attribute any portion of this difference to infertility perceptions.

      Conclusions

      Whereas most studies of religion and health emphasize the salubrious role of personal religiosity, our results suggest that evangelical Protestants may be especially likely to hold misconceptions about their fertility. Because these misconceptions fail to explain higher rates of inconsistent contraception use among evangelical Protestants, additional research is needed to understand the principles and motives of this unique religious community.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finer L.B.
        • Kost K.
        Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011; 43: 78-87
        • Finer L.B.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
        • Boonstra H.D.
        The challenge in helping young adults better manage their reproductive lives.
        Guttmacher Pol Rev. 2009; 12: 13-18
        • Raine T.
        • Minnis A.M.
        • Padian N.S.
        Determinants of contraceptive method among young women at risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.
        Contraception. 2003; 68: 19-25
        • Miller W.B.
        Why some women fail to use their contraceptive method: A psychological investigation.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1986; 18: 27-32
        • Chandra A.
        • Martinez G.M.
        • Mosher W.D.
        • et al.
        Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.
        Vital Health Stat. 2005; 25: 1-160
        • Polis C.B.
        • Zabin L.S.
        Missed conceptions or misconceptions: Perceived infertility among unmarried young adults in the United States.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 30
        • Downs J.S.
        • Bruine de Bruin W.
        • Murray P.J.
        • Fischhoff B.
        When “it only takes once” fails: Perceived infertility predicts condom use and STI acquisition.
        J Pediatric Adolesc Gynecol. 2004; 17: 224
        • Kinsella E.O.
        • Crane L.A.
        • Ogden L.G.
        • Stevens-Simon C.
        Characteristics of adolescent women who stop using contraception after use at first sexual intercourse.
        J Pediatric Adolesc Gynecol. 2007; 20: 73-81
        • Higgins J.A.
        • Popkin R.A.
        • Santelli J.S.
        Pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive use among young adults in the United States.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 236-243
        • Smith C.
        • Snell P.
        Souls in transition: the religious and spiritual lives of emerging adults.
        Oxford Univ Press, New York2009
        • Regnerus M.D.
        Forbidden fruit: sex and religion in the lives of American teenagers.
        Oxford Univ Press, New York2007
        • Smith C.
        Religious participation and network closure among American adolescents.
        J Sci Stud Relig. 2003; 42: 259-267
        • Brewster K.L.
        • Cooksey E.C.
        • Gulkey D.K.
        • Rindfuss R.R.
        The changing impact of religion on the sexual and contraceptive behavior of adolescent women in the United States.
        J Marriage Fam. 1998; 60: 493-504
        • Burdette A.M.
        • Hill T.D.
        Religious involvement and transitions into adolescent sexual activities.
        Sociol Relig. 2009; 70: 28-48
        • Meier A.M.
        Adolescents' transition to first intercourse, religiosity, and attitudes about sex.
        Soc Forces. 2003; 81: 1031-1052
        • Miller L.
        • Gur M.
        Religiousness and sexual responsibility in adolescent girls.
        J Adolesc Health. 2002; 31: 401-406
        • Landor A.
        • Simons L.
        • Simons R.
        • et al.
        The role of religiosity in the relationship between parents, peers, and adolescent risky sexual behavior.
        J Youth Adolesc. 2011; 40: 296-309
        • Thornton A.
        • Camburn D.
        Religious participation and adolescent sexual behavior and attitudes.
        J Marriage Fam. 1989; 51: 641-653
        • Bearman P.S.
        • Brückner H.
        Promising the future: virginity pledges and first intercourse.
        Am J Sociol. 2001; 106: 859-912
        • Manlove J.S.
        • Terry-Humen E.
        • Ikramullah E.N.
        • Moore K.A.
        The role of parent religiosity in teens' transitions to sex and contraception.
        J Adolesc Health. 2006; 39: 578-587
        • Jones R.K.
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Singh S.
        Religious differentials in the sexual and reproductive behaviors of young women in the United States.
        J Adolesc Health. 2005; 36: 279-288
        • Helm Jr., H.W.
        • McBride D.C.
        • Knox D.
        • Zusman M.
        The influence of a conservative religion on premarital sexual behavior of university students.
        N Am J Psychol. 2009; 11: 231-244
        • Uecker J.E.
        Religion, pledging, and the premarital sexual behavior of married young adults.
        J Marriage Fam. 2008; 70: 728-744
        • Burdette A.M.
        • Ellison C.G.
        • Hill T.D.
        • Glenn N.D.
        “Hooking up” at college: does religion make a difference?.
        J Sci Stud Relig. 2009; 48: 535-551
        • Kaye K.
        • Suellentrop K.
        • Sloup C.
        The fog zone: how misperceptions, magical thinking, and ambivalence put young adults at risk for unplanned pregnancy.
        National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy., Washington, DC2009
        • Missmer S.A.
        • Abusief M.E.
        • Barbieri R.L.
        • Goldman M.B.
        Infertility.
        in: Goldberg M.B. Troisi R. Rexrode K.M. Women and health. 2nd ed. Academic Press, Waltham (MA)2013: 251-270
        • Smith C.
        American evangelicalism: embattled and thriving.
        University of Chicago Press, Chicago (IL)1998
        • Borooah V.K.
        Logit and probit: ordered and multinomial models.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA)2002
        • Rainey D.Y.
        • Stevens-Simon C.
        • Kaplan D.W.
        Self-perception of infertility among female adolescents.
        Am J Dis Child. 1993; 147: 1053-1056
        • Bartkowski J.P.
        Remaking the godly marriage: gender negotiation in evangelical families.
        Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (NJ)2001
        • Gay D.A.
        • Ellison C.G.
        • Powers D.A.
        In search of denominational subcultures: religious affiliation and “pro–family” issues revisited.
        Rev Relig Res. 1996; 38: 3-17
        • Gaydos L.
        • Smith A.
        • Hogue C.
        • Blevins J.
        An emerging field in religion and reproductive health.
        J Relig Health. 2010; 49: 1-12