Advertisement

Temporal Associations of Popularity and Alcohol Use Among Middle School Students

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The goal of this study is to better understand the longitudinal cross-lagged associations between popularity, assessed through self-rating and peer nominations, and alcohol use among middle school students.

      Methods

      The analytical sample comprises 1,835 sixth- to eighth-grade students who were initially recruited from three California middle schools and surveyed in the fall and spring semesters of 2 academic years. Students reported on their background characteristics, past-month alcohol use, and perceived popularity. Additionally, students provided school-based friendship nominations, which were used to calculate peer-nominated popularity. A cross-lagged regression approach within a structural equation modeling framework was used to examine the longitudinal relationship between popularity (self-rated and peer-nominated) and alcohol use.

      Results

      There was a statistically significant (p = .024) association between peer-nominated popularity and the probability of alcohol consumption at the subsequent survey, but not vice versa. Our results suggest that in a scenario where 8% of students are past-month drinkers, each increase of five friendship nominations is associated with a 30% greater risk of being a current drinker at the next wave. We found no evidence of longitudinal associations between past-month alcohol consumption and self-rated popularity.

      Conclusions

      Popularity is a risk factor for drinking during the middle school years, with peer-nominated popularity being more predictive of use than self-perceptions of popularity. To inform alcohol prevention efforts for middle school students, additional research is needed to better understand why adolescents with a larger number of school-based friendship ties are more inclined to drink.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Allen J.P.
        • Porter M.R.
        • McFarland F.C.
        • et al.
        The two faces of adolescents' success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior.
        Child Dev. 2005; 76: 747-760
        • Ennett S.T.
        • Bauman K.E.
        • Hussong A.
        • et al.
        The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis.
        J Res Adolesc. 2006; 16: 159-186
        • Killeya-Jones L.A.
        • Nakajima R.
        • Costanzo P.R.
        Peer standing and substance use in early-adolescent grade-level networks: A short-term longitudinal study.
        Prev Sci. 2007; 8: 11-23
        • Kuntsche E.
        • Kuntsche S.
        Development and validation of the drinking motive questionnaire revised short form (DMQ-R SF).
        J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2009; 28: 899-908
        • Mayeux L.
        • Sandstrom M.J.
        • Cillessen A.H.
        Is being popular a risky proposition?.
        J Res Adolesc. 2008; 18: 49-74
        • Alexander C.
        • Piazza M.
        • Mekos D.
        • Valente T.
        Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking.
        J Adolesc Health. 2001; 29: 22-30
        • Dubow E.F.
        • Boxer P.
        • Huesmann L.R.
        Childhood and adolescent predictors of early and middle adulthood alcohol use and problem drinking: The Columbia County longitudinal study.
        Addiction. 2008; 103: 36-47
        • Valente T.W.
        • Unger J.B.
        • Johnson C.A.
        Do popular students smoke?.
        J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37: 323-329
        • Diego M.A.
        • Field T.M.
        • Sanders C.E.
        Academic performance, popularity, and depression predict adolescent substance use.
        Adolescence. 2003; 38: 35-42
        • Pirkle E.C.
        • Richter L.
        Personality, attitudinal and behavioral risk profiles of young female binge drinkers and smokers.
        J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38: 44-54
        • Tucker J.S.
        • Green Jr., H.D.
        • Zhou A.J.
        • et al.
        Substance use among middle school students: Associations with self-rated and peer-nominated popularity.
        J Adolesc Health. 2011; 34: 513-519
        • Johnston L.D.
        • O'Malley P.M.
        • Bachman J.G.
        • et al.
        Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2008: Volume I, secondary school students (NIH publication no. 09-7402).
        National Institute on Drug, Bethesda, MD2009
        • Shih R.A.
        • Miles J.N.
        • Tucker J.S.
        • et al.
        Racial/ethnic differences in adolescent substance use: Mediation by individual, family, and school factors.
        J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010; 71: 640-651
        • Lopez B.
        • Wang W.
        • Schwartz S.J.
        • et al.
        School, family, and peer factors and their association with substance use in Hispanic adolescents.
        J Prim Prev. 2009; 30: 622-641
        • Yan F.A.
        • Beck K.H.
        • Howard D.
        • et al.
        A structural model of alcohol use pathways among Latino youth.
        Am J Health Behav. 2008; 32: 209-219
      1. D'Amico EJ, Tucker JS, Miles JNV, et al. Preventing alcohol use with a voluntary after school program for middle school students: Results from a randomized controlled trial of project CHOICE. Prev Sci (in press).

        • Green Jr, H.D.
        Evaluating mechanisms of change in a smoking intervention (17IT-0007).
        University of California: Tobacco Related Disease Research Program, Oakland, CA2008
      2. WestEd.
        (2008)
        • Ellickson P.L.
        • McCaffrey D.F.
        • Ghosh-Dastidar B.
        • Longshore D.L.
        New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of project ALERT in middle schools.
        Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 1830-1836
        • Jarvinen D.W.
        • Nicholls J.G.
        Adolescent's social goals, beliefs about the causes of socio success, and satisfaction in peer relations.
        Dev Psychol. 1996; 32: 435-441
        • Borgatti S.P.
        • Everett M.G.
        • Freeman L.C.
        UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis.
        Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA2002
        • Freeman L.C.
        Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification.
        Soc Netw. 1979; 1: 215-239
        • Finkel S.E.
        Causal analysis with panel data.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA1995
        • Kenny D.A.
        Correlation and causality.
        Wiley, New York, NY1979
        • Muthén L.K.
        • Muthén B.O.
        Mplus User's Guide.
        Sixth Edition. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA1998-2011
        • Allison P.
        Missing data.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2009
      3. Arbuckle J. Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ1996
        • Little R.J.
        • Rubin D.B.
        Statistical analysis with missing data.
        Wiley, New York, NY1987
        • Bentler P.M.
        • Mooijaart A.
        Choice of structural model via parsimony: A rationale based on precision.
        Psychol Bull. 1989; 106: 315-317
        • Long J.S.
        Regression models for limited and categorical dependent variables.
        Sage, London, UK1997
        • Zuckerman E.W.
        • Jost J.T.
        What makes you think you're so popular?.
        Soc Psych Quart. 2001; 64: 207-223
        • Falci C.
        • Neely C.
        Too many friends: Social integration, network cohesion and adolescent depressive symptoms.
        Soc Forces. 2009; 87: 2031-2061
        • Go M.H.
        • Green Jr., H.D.
        • Kennedy D.P.
        • et al.
        Peer influence and selection effects on adolescent smoking.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010; 109: 239-242
        • Knecht A.B.
        • Burk W.J.
        • Weesie J.
        • et al.
        Friendship and alcohol use in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach.
        J Res Adolesc. 2011; 21: 475-487
        • Mercken L.
        • Snijders T.A.
        • Steglich C.
        • et al.
        Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: A social network analysis of adolescent smoking.
        Addiction. 2010; 105: 1280-1289
        • SAMHSA
        Results from the 2007 national survey on drug use and health: National findings.
        Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, MD2008
        • Moody J.
        • Brynildsen W.D.
        • Osgood D.W.
        • et al.
        Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence.
        Soc Networks. 2011; 33: 101-112