Advertisement

High Frequency Hearing Sensitivity in Adolescent Females of a Lower Socioeconomic Status Over a Period of 24 Years (1985–2008)

  • Abbey L. Berg
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Abbey L. Berg, Ph.D., Department of Biology and Health Sciences, Pace University, 41 Park Row, Room 509, New York, NY 10038
    Affiliations
    Department of Biology and Health Sciences, Communication Sciences and Disorders Program, Dyson College of Arts and Sciences, Pace University, New York, New York

    Departments of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery and Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yula C. Serpanos
    Affiliations
    Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 01, 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.014

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To examine annually over a period of 24 years, the high frequency hearing sensitivity in different groups of urban female adolescents with a low socioeconomic status (SES) and residential foster care.

      Methods

      Hearing screening (15 decibel [dB] hearing level ranging from 1,000 to 8,000 Hertz [Hz]) and threshold (>15 dB hearing level) records were obtained from 8,710 female adolescents (mean age, 15.8 years [range, 12–20 years]), predominantly Hispanic and African American from households with a low SES. Data related to the use of personal listening devices (PLDs), daily hours of usage, occurrence of tinnitus, and hearing thresholds between 1,000 and 8,000 Hz over an 8-year period (2001–2008) were obtained from the adolescents.

      Results

      High frequency hearing loss (HFHL) doubled over the 24-year period from 10.1% in 1985 to 19.2% in 2008. In comparison with the general adolescent population, this group of female adolescents presented with a higher percentage of bilateral mild or greater degrees of HFHL at two or more frequencies including 3,000, 4,000, and 6,000 Hz. Use of PLDs increased four-fold, from 18.3% (n = 68) in 2001 to 76.4% (n = 227) in 2008. Of the total number reporting tinnitus (n = 286), 99.7% (n = 285) also reported regular PLD use. A significant relationship was found between PLD use and reported tinnitus and HFHL irrespective of time of use of PLD.

      Conclusions

      Increased incidence of HFHL, reported tinnitus, PLD use, and hours of daily use in at-risk female adolescents of a low SES was found. A frequency interval of 3,000–6,000 Hz should be included in hearing screening protocols to identify potentially disabling hearing loss. Hearing conservation strategies need to be developed and/or modified that target and reach at-risk children and adolescents.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Davis J.M.
        • Elfenbein J.
        • Schum R.
        • et al.
        Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children.
        J Speech Hear Dis. 1986; 51: 53-62
        • Royster J.D.
        Noise-induced hearing loss.
        in: Northern J. Hearing Disorders. 3rd ed. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA1996: 177-189
        • McBride D.I.
        • Williams S.
        Audiometric notch as a sign of noise-induced hearing loss.
        Occup Environ Med. 2001; 58: 46-51
        • Anderson K.I.
        Keys to effective hearing conservation programs: Hearing status of school-age children.
        in: Proceedings of the ASHA Audiology Superconference. 21. ASHA, 1992: 38-47
        • Montgomery J.K.
        • Fujikawa S.
        Hearing thresholds of students in the second, eighth, and twelfth grades.
        Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1992; 23: 61-63
        • Holmes A.E.
        • Kaplan H.S.
        • Phillips R.M.
        • et al.
        Screening for hearing loss in adolescents.
        Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1997; 28: 70-75
        • Niskar A.S.
        • Kieszak S.M.
        • Holmes A.E.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
        JAMA. 1998; 279: 1071-1075
        • Axelsson A.
        • Aniansson G.
        • Costa O.
        Hearing loss in school children.
        Scand Audiol. 1987; 16: 137-143
        • Serra M.R.
        • Biassoni E.C.
        • Richter U.
        • et al.
        Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolescents.
        Int J Audiol. 2005; 44: 65-73
        • Vogel I.
        • Verschuure H.
        • van der Ploeg C.P.B.
        • et al.
        Adolescents and MP3 players: Too many risks, too few precautions.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 123: e953-e958
        • Fligor B.J.
        • Cox L.C.
        Output levels of commercially available portable compact disc players and the potential risk to hearing.
        Ear Hear. 2004; 25: 513-527
        • Niskar A.S.
        • Kieszak S.M.
        • Holmes A.E.
        • et al.
        Estimated prevalence of noise-induced threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States.
        Pediatrics. 2001; 25: 4-9
        • Brookhouser P.E.
        Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss.
        Prev Med. 1994; 23: 665-669
        • Erlandsson S.I.
        • Holmes A.
        • Widén S.E.
        • et al.
        Cultural and social perspectives on attitudes, noise, and risk behavior in children and young adults.
        Semin Hear. 2008; 29: 29-41
        • Olsen Widén S.E.
        • Erlandsson S.I.
        The influence of socioeconomic status on adolescent attitude to social noise and hearing protection.
        Noise Health. 2004; 25: 59-70
        • Meinke D.K.
        • Dice N.
        Comparison of audiometric screening criteria for the identification of noise-induced hearing loss in adolescents.
        Am J Audiol. 2007; 16: S190-S202
        • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
        Guidelines for Audiologic Screening [Guidelines], 1997.
        (Accessed June 11, 2010)
        • American National Standards Institute
        Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms (ANSI S3.1-1999 [R2008]).
        Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY2008
        • Peppard A.R.
        • Peppard S.B.
        Noise-induced hearing loss: A study of children at risk.
        Hear J. 1992; 45: 33-35
        • Tharpe A.M.
        • Bess F.H.
        Identification and management of children with minimal hearing loss.
        Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol. 1991; 21: 41-50
        • Carhart R.
        • Jeger J.F.
        Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds.
        J Speech Hear Dis. 1959; 24: 330-345
        • American National Standards Institute
        Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-2004).
        American National Standards Institute, New York, NY2004
        • International Standards Institute (ISO)
        Acoustics: Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment.
        International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland1998 (ISO 389-1 1998)
        • Wilber L.A.
        • Burkard R.
        Calibration: Puretone, speech, and noise signals.
        in: Katz J. Medwetsky L. Burkard R. Hood L. Handbook of Clinical Audiometry. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD2009: 7-29
        • American Academy of Audiology
        Turn it to the left.
        (Accessed June 11, 2010)
        • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
        Listen to your buds.
        (Accessed June 11, 2010)
        • Fligor B.J.
        • Meinke D.
        Safe-listening myths for personal music players.
        ASHA Leader. 2009; : 5-6
        • National Institute on Deafness and Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
        It's a noisy planet.
        (Accessed June 11, 2010)
        • Florentine M.
        • Hunter W.
        • Robinson M.
        • et al.
        On the behavioral characteristics of loud-music listening.
        Ear Hear. 1998; 19: 420-428
        • Olsen Widen S.E.
        • Erlandsson S.I.
        Self-reported tinnitus and noise sensitivity among adolescents in Sweden.
        Noise Health. 2004; 25: 29-40
        • Harrison R.V.
        Noise-induced hearing loss in children: A “Less than Silent” environmental danger.
        Paediatr Child Health. 2008; 13: 377-382
        • Evans G.W.
        • Kantrowitz E.
        Socioeconomic status and health: The potential role of environmental risk exposure.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2002; 23: 303-331
        • Evans G.W.
        • Marcynyszyn L.A.
        Environmental justice, cumulative environmental risk, and health among low and middle income children in upstate New York.
        Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 1942-1944
        • Kurtzman T.L.
        • Otsuka K.N.
        • Wahl R.A.
        Inhalant abuse by adolescents.
        J Adolesc Health. 2001; 28: 170-180
        • Gupta D.
        • Vishwakarma S.K.
        Toy weapons and firecrackers: A source of hearing loss.
        Laryngoscope. 1989; 99: 330-334
        • Barone J.A.
        • Peters J.M.
        • Garabrant D.H.
        • et al.
        Smoking as a risk factor in noise-induced hearing loss.
        J Occup Med. 1997; 29: 741-745
        • Konings A.
        • Van Laer L.
        • Van Camp G.
        Genetic studies on noise-induced hearing loss: A review.
        Ear Hear. 2009; 30: 151-159
        • Rice C.G.
        • Rossi G.
        • Olina M.
        Damage risk from personal cassette players.
        Br J Audiol. 1987; 21: 279-288
        • Henderson D.
        • Subramaniam M.
        • Boettcher F.
        Individual susceptibility to noise-induced haring loss: An old topic revisited.
        Ear Hear. 1993; 14: 152-168
        • Hidecker M.J.C.
        Noise-induced hearing loss in school-age children: What do we know?.
        Semin Hear. 2008; 29: 19-28