A Review of Positive Youth Development Programs That Promote Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health



      Positive youth development (PYD) may be a promising strategy for promoting adolescent health. A systematic review of the published data was conducted to identify and describe PYD programs that improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health.


      Eight databases were searched for articles about PYD programs published between 1985 and 2007. Programs included met the following criteria: fostered at least one of 12 PYD goals in multiple socialization domains (i.e., family, school, community) or addressed two or more goals in at least one socialization domain; allocated at least half of the program activities to promoting general PYD outcomes (as compared with a focus on direct sexual health content); included youth younger than 20 years old; and used an experimental or quasi-experimental evaluation design.


      Thirty programs met the inclusion criteria, 15 of which had evidence of improving at least one adolescent sexual and reproductive health outcome. Program effects were moderate and well-sustained. Program goals addressed by approximately 50% or more of the effective programs included promoting prosocial bonding, cognitive competence, social competence, emotional competence, belief in the future, and self-determination. Effective programs were significantly more likely than those that did not have an impact to strengthen the school context and to deliver activities in a supportive atmosphere. Effective programs were also more likely to build skills, enhance bonding, strengthen the family, engage youth in real roles and activities, empower youth, communicate expectations, and be stable and relatively long-lasting, although these differences between effective and ineffective programs were not statistically significant.


      PYD programs can promote adolescent sexual and reproductive health, and tested, effective PYD programs should be part of a comprehensive approach to promoting adolescent health. However, more research is needed before a specific list of program characteristics can be viewed as a “recipe” for success.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Sutton P.D.
        • et al.
        Births: Final data for 2006.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009; : 57
      1. Forhan S, Gottlieb S, Sternberg MR, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis among female adolescents in the United States: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004. Presented at: The 2008 National STD Prevention Conference, March 10–13, 2008, Chicago, IL. Available at:

        • Gavin L.
        • Mackay A.
        • Brown K.
        • et al.
        Sexual and reproductive health of persons aged 10–24 years, United States, 2002-2007.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58: 1-58
      2. Kirby D. Emerging answers 2007. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, 2007. Available at:

        • Bearinger L.H.
        • Sieving R.E.
        • Ferguson J.
        • et al.
        Global perspectives on the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents: Patterns, prevention, and potential.
        Lancet. 2007; 369: 1220-1231
        • Catalano R.F.
        • Berglund M.L.
        • Ryan J.A.
        • et al.
        Positive youth development in the United States. Research findings on evaluations of the positive youth development programs (Report to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, 1998).
        Prevention and Treatment. 2002; 5
        • Eccles J.S.
        • Gootman J.A.
        • Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth, National Research Council (US)
        Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Institute of Medicine (US). Community Programs to Promote Youth Development.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2002
        • Pittman K.J.
        • O'Brien J.
        • Kimball M.
        Youth development and resiliency research: Making connections to substance abuse prevention.
        Forum for Youth Investment, New York, NY1993
        • Lerner R.M.
        • Fisher C.B.
        • Weinberg R.A.
        Towards a science for and of the people: Promoting civil society through the application of developmental science.
        Child Dev. 2000; 71: 11-20
        • Roth J.L.
        • Brooks-Gunn J.
        Youth development programs: Risk, prevention and policy.
        J Adolesc Health. 2003; 32: 170-182
        • Flay B.R.
        • Graumlich S.
        • Segawa E.
        • et al.
        Effects of 2 prevention programs on high-risk behaviors among African American youth.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004; 158: 377-384
        • Campbell F.A.
        • Ramey C.T.
        • Pungello E.
        • et al.
        Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian project.
        Appl Dev Sci. 2002; 6: 42-57
        • East P.
        • Kiernan E.
        • Chavez G.
        An evaluation of California's adolescent sibling pregnancy prevention program.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003; 35: 62-70
        • Clark L.
        • Miller K.
        • Nagy S.
        • et al.
        Adult identity mentoring: Reducing sexual risk for African American seventh grade students.
        J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37: 337
        • Harrington N.G.
        • Giles S.M.
        • Hoyle R.H.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the all stars character education and problem behavior prevention program: Effects on mediator and outcome variables for middle school students.
        Health Educ Behav. 2001; 28: 533-546
        • Hansen W.B.
        Pilot test results comparing the all stars program with seventh grade DARE: Program integrity and mediating analysis.
        Subst Use Misuse. 1996; 31: 1359-1377
        • Philliber S.
        • Kay J.W.
        • Herrling S.
        • et al.
        Preventing pregnancy and improving health care access among teenagers: An evaluation of the children's aid society—Carrera program.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002; 34: 244-251
        • Prado G.
        • Pantin H.
        • Briones E.
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled trial of a parent-centered intervention in preventing substance use and HIV risk behaviors in Hispanic adolescents.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007; 75: 914-926
        • Patton G.C.
        • Bond L.
        • Carlin J.B.
        • et al.
        Promoting social inclusion in schools: A group-randomized trial of effects on student health risk behavior and well-being.
        Am J Public Health. 2006; 96: 1582-1587
        • Patton G.C.
        • Bond L.
        • Butler H.
        • et al.
        Changing schools, changing health? The design and implementation of the Gatehouse project.
        J Adolesc Health. 2003; 33: 231-239
        • Patton G.C.
        • Glover S.
        • Butler H.
        • et al.
        The Gatehouse project: Building capacity for mental health promotion in secondary schools.
        Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000; 34: 586-593
        • Bond L.
        • Glover S.
        • Godfrey C.
        • et al.
        Measuring system level change in schools: Lessons from the Gatehouse project.
        Health Educ Behav. 2001; 28: 368-383
        • Piper D.L.
        • Moberg P.
        • King M.J.
        The Healthy for Life Project: Behavioral outcomes.
        J Prim Prev. 2000; 21: 47-73
        • Moberg D.P.
        • Piper D.L.
        The Healthy for Life Project: Sexual risk behavior outcomes.
        AIDS Educ Prev. 1998; 10: 128-148
        • Schweinhart L.
        • Barnes H.V.
        • Weikart D.P.
        Significant Benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 27. Monograph of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 10.
        High/Scope Press, Ypsilanti, MI1992
        • Schweinhart L.J.
        • Montie J.
        • Xiang Z.
        • et al.
        Lifetime Effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 40. Monograph of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 14.
        High/Scope Press, Ypsilanti, MI2005
      3. Summaries. Available at:

        • Epstein A.S.
        Essentials of Active Learning in Preschool: Getting to Know the High/Scope Curriculum.
        High/Scope Press, Ypsilanti, MI2007
        • Schochet P.Z.
        • Burghard J.
        • Glazerman S.
        National Job Corps study: The short-term impacts of Job Corps on participants' employment and related outcomes.
        US Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Washington, DC2000 (Report and Evaluation Report Series 00-A)
        • Cave G.
        • Bos H.
        • Doolittle F.
        • et al.
        JOBSTART: Final report on a program for school drop outs.
        Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, New York, NY1993
        • Dilorio C.
        • Resnicow K.
        • Thomas S.
        • et al.
        Keepin' it R.E.A.L: Program description and results of baseline assessment.
        Health Educ Behav. 2002; 29: 104-123
        • Dilorio C.
        • Resnicow K.
        • McCarty F.
        • et al.
        Keepin' it R.E.A.L: Results of a mother-adolescent HIV prevention program.
        Nurs Res. 2006; 55: 43-51
        • Melchior A.
        National evaluation of learn and serve America school and community-based programs: Final report.
        Center for Human Resources, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA1998
        • Wolchik S.A.
        • West S.G.
        • Sandler I.N.
        • et al.
        An experimental evaluation of theory-based mother and mother-child programs for children of divorce.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68: 843-856
        • Wolchik S.A.
        • Sandler I.N.
        • Millsap R.E.
        • et al.
        Six-year follow-up of preventive interventions for children of divorce.
        JAMA. 2002; 288: 1874-1881
        • Wolchik S.
        • Sandler I.N.
        • Weiss L.
        • et al.
        New beginnings: An empirically-based intervention program for divorced mothers to promote resilience in their children.
        in: Briesmeister J.M. Schaefer C.E. Handbook of Parent Training: Helping Parents Prevent and Solve Problem Behaviors. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY2007: 25-62
        • Jorgensen S.R.
        Project taking charge: An evaluation of an adolescent pregnancy prevention program.
        Fam Relat. 1991; 40: 373-380
        • Hahn A.
        • Leavitt T.
        • Aaron P.
        Evaluation of the Quantum Opportunities Program (QOP): Did the program work?.
        Brandeis University, Heller Graduate School, Center for Human Resources, Waltham, MA1994
      4. American Youth Policy Forum. Some things do make a difference for youth: Quantum opportunities. Washington, DC. Available at:

      5. Eisenhower foundation. Replicating & evaluating: Quantum Opportunities Program replication design. Available at: Accessed October 10, 2007.

        • O'Donnell L.
        • Stueve A.
        • Doval A.S.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of the reach for health community youth service learning program to reduce early and unprotected sex among urban middle school students.
        Am J Public Health. 1998; 89: 176-181
        • O'Donnell L.
        • Stueve A.
        • O'Donnell C.
        • et al.
        Long-term reductions in sexual initiation and sexual activity among urban middle schoolers in the reach for health service learning program.
        J Adolesc Health. 2002; 31: 93-100
        • Trenholm C.
        • Devaney B.
        • Fortson K.
        • et al.
        Impacts of four Title V, Section 510 abstinence education programs: Final report.
        Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ2007
        • Hawkins J.D.
        • Catalano R.F.
        • Kosterman R.
        • et al.
        Preventing adolescent health risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999; 53: 226-234
        • Lonczak H.S.
        • Abbott R.D.
        • Hawkins J.D.
        • et al.
        Effects of the Seattle social development project on sexual behavior, pregnancy, birth and sexually transmitted disease outcomes by age 21 years.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002; 156: 438-447
        • Abbott R.D.
        • O'Donnell J.
        • Hawkins J.D.
        • et al.
        Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school.
        Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1998; 68: 542-552
        • Hawkins J.D.
        • Doueck H.J.
        • Lishner D.M.
        Changing teaching practices in mainstream classrooms to improve bonding and behavior of low achievers.
        Am Educ Res J. 1998; 25: 31-50
        • Haggerty K.
        • Skinner M.L.
        • MacKenzie E.P.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of Parents Who Care: Effects on key outcomes at 24-month follow-up.
        Prev Sci. 2007; 8: 249-260
        • Walker G.
        • Vilella-Velez F.
        Testing the model.
        in: Anatomy of a Demonstration: The Summer Training and Education Program (STEP) from Pilot through Replication and Postprogram Impacts. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA1992
        • Walker G.
        • Vilella-Velez F.
        Long-term impacts.
        in: Anatomy of a Demonstration: The Summer Training and Education Program (STEP) from Pilot through Replication and Post Program Impacts. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA1992
        • Bayne Smith M.A.
        Teen incentives program: Evaluation of a health promotion model for adolescent pregnancy prevention.
        J Health Educ. 1994; 25: 24-29
        • Allen J.
        • Philliber S.
        • Herrling S.
        • et al.
        Preventing teen pregnancy and academic failure: Experimental evaluation of a developmentally based approach.
        Child Dev. 1997; 64: 729-742
        • Allen J.
        • Kuperminc G.
        • Philliber S.
        • et al.
        Programmatic prevention of adolescent problem behaviors: The role of autonomy, relatedness and volunteer service in the teen outreach program.
        Am J Community Psychol. 1994; 22: 617-638
        • Allen J.
        • Philliber S.
        • Hoggson N.
        School-based prevention of teenage pregnancy and school drop-out: Process evaluation of the national replication of the teen outreach program.
        Am J Community Psychol. 1990; 18: 505-524
        • Allen J.P.
        • Philliber S.
        Who benefits most from a broadly targeted prevention program? Differential efficacy across populations in the teen outreach program.
        J Community Psychol. 2001; 29: 637-655
      6. Flay BR. Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Falls Church, VA: Society for Prevention Research, 2004. Available at:

        • Chambliss D.L.
        • Holton S.D.
        Defining empirically supported therapies.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998; 66: 7-18
      7. Scher LS, Maynard R. Interventions intended to reduce pregnancy-related outcomes among adolescents. Campbell Collaboration Social Welfare Group, 2006. Available at:>welfare/index.php.

        • Kirby D.B.
        • Rhodes T.
        • Campe S.
        The implementation of multi-component youth programs to prevent teen pregnancy modeled after the children's Aid Society Carrera Program.
        ETR Associates, Scotts Valley, CA2005
        • Kirby D.
        Reducing pregnancy and risky behaviour in teenagers: Youth development programs don't always work.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: 116-117