Associations between State-level Soda Taxes and Adolescent Body Mass Index



      Soft drink consumption has been linked with higher energy intake, obesity, and poorer health. Fiscal pricing policies such as soda taxes may lower soda consumption and, in turn, reduce weight among U.S. adolescents.


      This study used multivariate linear regression analyses to examine the associations between state-level grocery store and vending machine soda taxes and adolescent body mass index (BMI). We used repeated cross-sections of individual-level data on adolescents drawn from the Monitoring the Future surveys combined with state-level tax data and local area contextual measures for the years 1997 through 2006.


      The results showed no statistically significant associations between state-level soda taxes and adolescent BMI. Only a weak economic and statistically significant effect was found between vending machine soda tax rates and BMI among teens at risk for overweight.


      Current state-level tax rates are not found to be significantly associated with adolescent weight outcomes. It is likely that taxes would need to be raised substantially to detect significant associations between taxes and adolescent weight.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ogden C.
        • Carroll M.
        • Flegal K.
        High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003–2006.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 2401-2405
        • Nielsen S.J.
        • Siega-Riz A.M.
        • Popkin B.M.
        Trends in energy intake in U.S. between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups.
        Obes Res. 2002; 10: 370-378
        • Nielsen S.J.
        • Popkin B.M.
        Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001.
        Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27: 205-210
        • Wang Y.C.
        • Bleich S.N.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among US children and adolescents, 1988–2004.
        Pediatrics. 2008; 121: e1604-e1614
        • French S.A.
        • Lin B.H.
        • Guthrie J.F.
        National trends in soft drink consumption among children and adolescents age 6 to 17 years: prevalence, amounts, and sources, 1977/1978 to 1994/1998.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2003; 103: 1326-1331
        • Guthrie J.F.
        • Morton J.F.
        Food sources of added sweeteners in the diets of Americans.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2000; 100 (quiz): 43-51
        • Malik V.S.
        • Schulze M.B.
        • Hu F.B.
        Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 84: 274-288
        • Vartanian L.R.
        • Schwartz M.B.
        • Brownell K.D.
        Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 667-675
        • Alliance for a Healthier Generation
        Memorandum of Understanding Regarding School Beverage Policy.
        Alliance for a Healthier Generation, New York2006
        • Mello M.M.
        • Pomeranz J.
        • Moran P.
        The interplay of public health law and industry self-regulation: the case of sugar-sweetened beverage sales in schools.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 595-604
        • Greves H.M.
        • Rivara F.
        Report card on school snack food policies among the United States' largest school districts in 2004–2005: room for improvement.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3: 1
        • O'Toole T.P.
        • Anderson S.
        • Miller C.
        • Guthrie J.
        Nutrition services and foods and beverages available at school: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006.
        J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 500-521
      1. Institute of Medicine. Food Marketing to Children and Youth: Threat or Opportunity?.
        The National Academies Press, Washington, DC2006
        • Powell L.M.
        • Christopher Auld M.
        • Chaloupka F.J.
        • et al.
        Access to fast food and food prices: relationship with fruit and vegetable consumption and overweight among adolescents.
        Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2007; 17: 23-48
        • Jacobson M.F.
        • Brownell K.D.
        Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health.
        Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 854-857
        • Marshall T.
        Exploring a fiscal food policy: the case of diet and ischaemic heart disease.
        BMJ. 2000; 320: 301-305
        • Leicester A.
        • Windmeijer F.
        The “Fat Tax”: Economic Incentive to Reduce Obesity, Briefing Note 4.
        Institute for Fiscal Studies, London2004 (1–19)
        • Caraher M.
        • Cowburn G.
        Taxing food: implications for public health nutrition.
        Public Health Nutr. 2005; 8: 1242-1249
        • Kim D.
        • Kawachi I.
        Food taxation and pricing strategies to “thin out” the obesity epidemic.
        Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30: 430-437
      2. Patrick DL, Murray TP. FY2010 House 1 Budget Recommendation: Policy Brief. Available at: Accessed 2009.

      3. New York State. 2009–2010 Executive Budget, Briefing Book, Revenue Actions. Available at: Accessed 2008.

        • Chriqui J.F.
        • Eidson S.S.
        • Bates H.
        • et al.
        State sales tax rates for soft drinks and snacks sold through grocery stores and vending machines, 2007.
        J Public Health Policy. 2008; 29: 226-249
        • Sturm R.
        • Datar A.
        Body mass index in elementary school children, metropolitan area food prices and food outlet density.
        Public Health. 2005; 119: 1059-1068
        • Sturm R.
        • Datar A.
        Food prices and weight gain during elementary school: 5-year update.
        Public Health. 2008; 122: 1140-1143
        • Auld M.C.
        • Powell L.M.
        Economics of food energy density and adolescent body weight.
        Economica. 2009; ([Epub July 15, 2008])
        • Powell L.M.
        • Bao Y.
        Food prices, access to food outlets and child weight.
        Econ Hum Biol. 2009; 7: 64-72
      4. Chou SY, Rashad I, Grossman M. Fast-Food Restaurant Advertising on Television and Its Influence on Childhood Obesity. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series 2005;No. 11879.

        • Chou S.Y.
        • Rashad I.
        • Grossman M.
        Fast- food restaurant advertising on television and its influence on childhood obesity.
        J Law Econ. 2008; 51: 599-618
        • Mersky R.M.
        • Dunn D.J.
        Fundamentals of Legal Research.
        8th ed. Foundation Press, New York2002
        • Stone G.R.
        • Seidman L.M.
        • Sunstein C.R.T.M.V.
        Constitutional Law.
        4th ed. Aspen, New York2001
      5. Federation of Tax Administrators. State sales tax rates: January 1, 2007. Federation of Tax Administrators. Available at: 2007.

        • Johnston L.D.
        • O'Malley P.M.
        • Bachman J.G.
        • Schulenberg J.E.
        Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2003. Volume I: Secondary School Students.
        National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD2004 (NIH Publication No. 04-5507)
        • Kuczmarski M.F.
        • Kuczmarski R.J.
        • Najjar M.
        Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
        1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001; 101: 28-34
      6. U.S.Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 3 Technical Documentation. 2002.

        • Froot K.A.
        Consistent covariance matrix estimation with cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data.
        J Financial Quant Anal. 1989; 24: 333-355
        • Orzechowski and Walker
        Tax Burden on Tobacco.
        Orzechowski and Walker, Arlington, VA2008
        • Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
        Budget Options, Volume 1: Health Care.
        Congressional Budget Office (Option 106), Washington, DC2008