Advertisement

Impact of Sexual Harassment Victimization by Peers on Subsequent Adolescent Victimization and Adjustment: A Longitudinal Study

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To examine gender differences in prevalence and types of sexual harassment victimization experienced in grade 9 and how it contributes to relationship victimization and psychological adjustment 2.5 years later.

      Methods

      A total of 1734 students from 23 schools completed self-report surveys at entry to grade 9 and end of grade 11. Self-report data were collected on victimization experiences (sexual harassment, physical dating violence, peer violence, and relational victimization) and adjustment (emotional distress, problem substance use, self-harm, suicidal thoughts, maladaptive dieting, feeling unsafe at school, and perpetration of violent delinquency). Separate analyses by sex were prespecified.

      Results

      Sexual harassment victimization was common among boys (42.4%) and girls (44.1%) in grade 9, with girls reporting more sexual jokes, comments, and unwanted touch than among boys, and with boys reporting more homosexual slurs or receiving unwanted sexual content. For girls, sexual harassment victimization in grade 9 was associated with elevated risk of self-harm, suicidal thoughts, maladaptive dieting, early dating, substance use, and feeling unsafe at school. A similar pattern of risk was found for boys, with the exception of dieting and self-harm behaviors. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) indicated these students were significantly more likely than nonharassed students to report victimization by peers and dating partners 2.5 years later (AOR for boys and girls, respectively; all p < .01), including sexual harassment (AOR: 2.45; 2.9), physical dating violence (AOR: 2.02; 3.73), and physical peer violence (AOR: 2.75; 2.79). Gr 9 sexual harassment also contributed significantly to emotional distress (AOR: 2.09; 2.24), problem substance use (AOR: 1.79; 2.04), and violent delinquency perpetration (AOR: 2.1; 3.34) 2.5 years later (boys and girls, respectively; all p < .01).

      Conclusions

      Sexual harassment at the beginning of high school is a strong predictor of future victimization by peers and dating partners for both girls and boys, and warrants greater prevention and intervention efforts.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • McMaster L.E.
        • Connolly J.
        • Pepler D.
        • et al.
        Peer to peer sexual harassment in early adolescence: A developmental perspective.
        Devel Psychopathol. 2002; 14: 91-105
        • Gruber J.E.
        • Fineran S.
        The impact of bullying and sexual harassment on middle and high school girls.
        Viol Against Women. 2007; 13: 627-643
        • Street A.E.
        • Gradus J.L.
        • Stafford J.
        • et al.
        Gender differences in experiences of sexual harassment: Data from a male-dominated environment.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007; 75: 464-474
        • Lindberg S.M.
        • Grabe S.
        • Hyde J.S.
        Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence.
        J Res Adolesc. 2007; 17: 723-742
      1. American Association of University Women. Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing and sexual harassment in School. Washington, DC, 2001.

      2. Ontario Secondary School Teacher Federation. The joke's over: Student to student sexual harassment in secondary schools. Toronto, ON, 1995.

        • Walsh M.
        • Duffy J.
        • Gallagher-Duffy J.
        A more accurate approach to measuring the prevalence of sexual harassment among high school students.
        Can J Behav Sci. 2007; 39: 110-118
        • Goldstein S.E.
        • Malanchuk O.
        • Davis-Kean P.E.
        • et al.
        Risk factors of sexual harassment by peers: A longitudinal investigation of African American and European American adolescents.
        J Res Adolesc. 2007; 17: 285-300
        • Gottfredson M.R.
        • Hirschi T.
        A general theory of crime.
        Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA1990
        • Hawkins D.
        • Weis J.G.
        The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention.
        J Prim Prev. 1985; 6: 73-97
        • Hodges E.V.
        • Perry D.G.
        Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers.
        J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999; 76: 677-685
        • Card N.A.
        • Isaacs J.
        • Hodges E.V.
        Multiple contextual levels of risk for peer victimization: A review with implications for prevention and intervention efforts.
        in: Miller T.W. School Violence and Primary Prevention. Springer, Oregon2008: 125-154
        • Wolfe D.A.
        • Jaffe P.
        • Crooks C.C.
        Adolescent risk behaviors: Why teens experiment and strategies to keep them safe.
        Yale University Press, New Haven, CT2006
        • Wolfe D.A.
        • Scott K.
        • Reitzel-Jaffe D.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory.
        Psychol Assess. 2001; 13: 277-293
        • Human Resources Development Canada
        National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth: Cycle 4 2000–2001.
        Canada, Ottawa, ON2004
        • Crooks C.V.
        • Scott K.L.
        • Wolfe
        • et al.
        Understanding the link between childhood maltreatment and violent delinquency: What do schools have to add?.
        Child Mal. 2007; 3: 269-280
        • Linder J.R.
        • Crick N.R.
        • Collins W.
        • et al.
        Relational aggression and victimization in young adults' romantic relationships: Associations with perceptions of parent, peer, and romantic relationship quality.
        Soc Devel. 2002; 11: 69-86
        • Derogatis L.R.
        BSI (Brief Symptom Inventory).
        Pearson Education, 2001
        • Kann L.
        • Kinchen S.A.
        • Williams B.I.
        • et al.
        Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 1999.
        MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000; 49: 1-96
        • Ormerod A.J.
        • Collinsworth L.L.
        • Perry L.
        Critical climate: Relations among sexual harassment, climate, and outcomes for high school girls and boys.
        Psychol Women Q 2008. 2008; 32: 113-125
        • Bagley C.
        • Bolitho F.
        • Bertrand L.
        Sexual assault in school, mental healthy and suicidal behaviors in adolescent women in Canada.
        Adolescence. 1997; 32: 361-366
        • Larkin J.
        • Popaleni K.
        Heterosexual courtship violence and sexual harassment: The private and public control of young women.
        Fem Psychol. 1994; 4: 213-227
        • Leaper C.
        • Friedman C.K.
        The socialization of gender.
        in: Grusec J. Hastings P. Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research. Guilford, New York2007: 561-587
        • Hand J.Z.
        • Sanchez L.
        Badgering or bantering? Gender differences in experience of, and reactions to, sexual harassment among U.S. high school students.
        Gend Soc. 2000; 14: 718-746
      3. Wolfe DA, Crooks CV, Jaffe PG, et al. A universal school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: A cluster randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med (in press).