Advertisement

Virginity Pledges Among the Willing: Delays in First Intercourse and Consistency of Condom Use

      Abstract

      Purpose

      We examine longitudinal relationships between virginity pledging in adolescence and both sexual initiation and condom use. Prior studies have had mixed results and may not adequately control for prepledge differences between pledgers and nonpledgers.

      Methods

      Data came from a national sample of 12- to 17-year-olds surveyed in 2001 and reinterviewed 1 and 3 years later. Logistic regression models estimated the association between making a pledge and each outcome. Selection bias was reduced through propensity-score weighting and a rich set of demographic and psychosocial covariates.

      Results

      Pledgers and nonpledgers differed substantially in preexisting characteristics. However, after propensity weighting and statistical controls, pledging was still associated with delayed intercourse. We estimate that in the absence of pledging 42.4% of virgins with characteristics indicating an inclination to pledge initiate intercourse within 3 years; in the presence of the pledge, 33.6% of such youth initiate intercourse. Among those who had sex during this period, pledging was unassociated with condom use. Among those who did not have sex during this period, pledging was unassociated with engagement in noncoital sexual behavior.

      Conclusions

      Making a virginity pledge appears to be an effective means of delaying sexual intercourse initiation among those inclined to pledge without influencing other sexual behavior; pledging does not appear to affect sexual safety among pledgers who fail to remain abstinent.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Adolescent Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alan Guttmacher Institute
        U.S. Teenage Pregnancy Statistics: National and State Trends and Trends by Race and Ethnicity.
        New York, Alan Guttmacher Institute2006 (Accessed January 8, 2008)
        • Weinstock H.
        • Berman S.
        • Cates Jr, W.
        Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004; 36: 6-10
        • Koyle P.
        • Jensen L.
        • Olsen J.
        Comparison of sexual behaviors among adolescents having an early, middle and late first intercourse experience.
        Youth Soc. 1989; 20: 461-476
        • Bearman P.
        • Brückner H.
        Promising the future: virginity pledges and first intercourse.
        Am J Sociol. 2001; 106: 859-912
        • Ajzen I.
        • Fishbein M.
        Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.
        Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1980
        • Festinger L.
        A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.
        Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA1957
        • Bem D.J.
        Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.
        Psychol Rev. 1967; 74: 183-200
        • Committee on Government Reform—Minority Staff
        The content of federally funded abstinence-only education programs.
        United States House of Representatives, Washington, DC2004
        • Brückner H.
        • Bearman P.
        After the Promise: the STD consequences of adolescent Virginity pledges.
        J Adolescent Health. 2005; 36: 271-278
        • Bersamin M.M.
        • Walker S.
        • Waiters E.D.
        • et al.
        Promising to wait: virginity pledges and adolescent sexual behavior.
        J Adolesc Health. 2005; 36: 428-436
        • Trenholm C.
        • Devaney B.
        • Forston K.
        • et al.
        Impacts of Four Title V, Section 510 Abstinence Education Programs.
        Mathematica Policy Research, Inc, Princeton, NJ2007 (Accessed January 8, 2008)
        • Rosenbaum P.R.
        • Rubin D.B.
        The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.
        Biometrika. 1983; 70: 41-55
        • Holland P.W.
        Statistics and causal inference.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 1986; 81: 945-960
        • Imbens G.
        Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review.
        National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, Cambridge, MA2008 (NBER Technical Report T0294) (Accessed January 8, 2008)
        • Miller K.
        • Clark L.
        • Wendell D.A.
        • et al.
        Adolescent heterosexual experience: a new typology.
        J Adolesc Health. 1997; 20: 179-186
        • Collins R.L.
        • Elliott M.N.
        • Berry S.H.
        • et al.
        Watching sex on TV predicts adolescent initiation of sexual behavior.
        Pediatrics. 2004; 114: e1-e10
        • Little R.J.
        • Rubin D.B.
        Statistical Analysis with Missing Data.
        2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York2002
        • Wooldridge J.
        Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.
        MIT Press, Cambridge, MA2001
        • Hirano K.
        • Imbens G.
        • Ridder G.
        Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score.
        Econometrica. 2003; 71: 1161-1189
        • Normand S.L.T.
        • Landrum M.B.
        • Guadagnoli E.
        • et al.
        Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following an acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54: 387-398
        • Rosenbaum P.R.
        • Rubin D.B.
        Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score.
        Am Stat. 1985; 39: 33-38
        • Rubin D.B.
        Practical implications of modes of statistical inference in causal effects and the critical role of the assignment mechanism.
        Biometrics. 1991; 47: 1213-1234
        • Robins J.M.
        • Hernan M.A.
        • Brumback B.
        Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.
        Epidemiology. 2000; 11: 550-560
        • Lunceford J.K.
        • Davidian M.
        Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.
        Stat Med. 2004; 23: 2937-2960
        • Muthén L.K.
        • Muthén B.O.
        Mplus User's Guide.
        Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA2004
        • Yuan K.H.
        • Marshall L.L.
        • Bentler P.M.
        A unified approach to exploratory factor analysis with missing data, nonnormal data, and in the presence of outliers.
        Psychometrika. 2002; 7: 95-122
        • Aarons S.J.
        • Jenkins R.R.
        • Raine T.R.
        • et al.
        Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students: a randomized controlled evaluation.
        J Adolesc Health. 2000; 27: 236-247
        • Coyle K.K.
        • Kirby D.B.
        • Marin B.V.
        • et al.
        Draw the Line/Respect the Line: a randomized trial of a middle school intervention to reduce sexual risk behaviors.
        Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 848-851
        • Eisen M.
        • Zellman G.L.
        • McAlister A.L.
        Evaluating the impact of a theory-based sexuality and contraceptive education program.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1990; 22: 261-271
        • Kirby D.B.
        • Baumler E.
        • Coyle K.K.
        • et al.
        The “Safer Choices” intervention: its impact on the sexual behaviors of different subgroups of high school students.
        J Adolesc Health. 2004; 35: 442-452
        • Manlove J.
        • Romano-Papillo A.
        • Ikramullah E.
        Not Yet: Programs to Delay First Sex among Teens.
        National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, Washington, DC2004
        • Abma J.C.
        • Martinez G.M.
        • Mosher W.D.
        • Dawson B.S.
        Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2002.
        Vital Health Stat. 2004; 23: 1-87
        • Santelli J.
        • Ott M.A.
        • Lyon M.
        • Rogers J.
        • Summers D.
        Abstinence-only education policies and programs: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
        J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38: 83-87
        • Rosenbaum J.
        Reborn a virgin: adolescents' retracting of virginity pledges and sexual histories.
        Am J Public Health. 2006; 96: 1098-1103