Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 46, Issue 2 , Pages 152-161, February 2010

Efficacy of a Motivational Behavioral Intervention to Promote Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening in Young Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Mariam R. Chacko, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Mariam R. Chacko, M.D., Suite 1710 Clinical Care Center, Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin Str., Houston, TX 77030.
  • ,
  • Constance M. Wiemann, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Claudia A. Kozinetz, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Kirk von Sternberg, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Mary M. Velasquez, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Peggy B. Smith, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Ralph DiClemente, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

Received 22 December 2008; accepted 9 June 2009. published online 03 August 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Seeking screening and treatment for chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (GC) by young women is critical to reduction of asymptomatic cervicitis and its complications.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of a client-centered motivational behavioral intervention (MBI), to promote seeking of sexually tranmitted infection (STI) checkups by young women.

Methods

Three hundred seventy-six of 770 eligible sexually active, nonpregnant, English-speaking women (mean age 18.5 years) were recruited from an urban reproductive health clinic and randomized to two groups: intervention plus standard care (MBI) or standard care alone (SC). MBI (two sessions plus booster) was based on the Transtheoretical Model of Change and employed motivational interviewing. Outcome measures monitored for 12 months included: client-initiated clinic visits for STI checkups in response to seven high-risk sexual behaviors by self-report (primary), consistent condom use, number of CT and GC episodes, and movement along the stages of change obtained at baseline and 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments (secondary). Analyses included chi-square, logistic regression, and generalized estimating equations.

Results

At baseline, more than 70% endorsed the action stage of change for seeking STI checkups for three of seven high-risk sexual behaviors. No significant differences were noted between the two groups for the primary or secondary outcomes. Across groups, having multiple partners and being pregnant or thinking one might be pregnant were associated with STI checkups.

Conclusions

This is the first known client-centered clinical trial to promote STI screening. Risk-taking and health-seeking behaviors are complex and interrelated with STI and pregnancy concerns. The intervention may have an effect if it is targeted to women in a less medically connected community-based sample.

Keywords: STI screening, Chlamydia screening, Gonorrhea screening, Transtheoretical model and STI screening, Chlamydia in young women, Promoting STI screening

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 K. von Sternberg and M.M. Valasquez are now at the University of Texas Health Science Center, Austin, Texas.

PII: S1054-139X(09)00243-2

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.012

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 46, Issue 2 , Pages 152-161, February 2010