Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 296-299 , September 2009

Correlates of Consistent Condom Use with Main-New and Main-Old Sexual Partners

  • Constance M. Wiemann, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Constance M. Wiemann, Ph.D., Texas Children's Hospital, Clinical Care Center, 6621 Fannin Street, CC 1710.01, Houston, TX 77030.
  • ,
  • Mariam R. Chacko, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Claudia A. Kozinetz, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Ralph DiClemente, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Peggy B. Smith, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Mary M. Velasquez, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Kirk von Sternberg, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas

Received 6 June 2008 ,Accepted 4 March 2009.

References 

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in reportable sexually transmitted diseases in the United States, 2005: National Surveillance Data for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Syphillis. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/STD/stats07/trends.htm. Accessed June 3, 2009.
  2. Ott MA, Adler NE, Millstein SG, et al. The trade-off between hormonal contraceptives and condoms among adolescents. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;34:6–14
  3. Fortenberry JD, Tu W, Harezlak J, et al. Condom use as a function of time in new and established adolescent sexual relationships. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:211–213
  4. Chacko MR, Wiemann CM, Kozinetz CA, et al. New sexual partners and readiness to seek screening for chlamydia and gonorrhoea: Predictors among minority young women. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:75–79
  5. Warner L, Newman DR, Austin HD, et al. Condom effectiveness for reducing transmission of gonorrhea and chlamydia: The importance of assessing partner infection status. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:242–251
  6. Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:125–137
  7. The SAS Institute . SAS System for Windows. 8.2 Edition. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute; 2001;
  8. Plichta SB, Weisman CS, Nathanson CA, et al. Partner-specific condom use among adolescent women clients of a family planning clinic. J Adolesc Health. 1992;13:506–511
  9. Warner L, Newman DR, Kamb ML, et al. Problems with condom use among patients attending sexually transmitted disease clinics: Prevalence, predictors, and relation to incident gonorrhea and chlamydia. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:341–349

PII: S1054-139X(09)00104-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.001

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 296-299 , September 2009