Why Do Adolescent Health Researchers Ignore the Impact of the Media?
Article Outline
Imagine publishing a study on lung cancer and not assessing the smoking status of the patients; or publishing a review article on coronary artery disease and not mentioning the importance of lipid levels.
Recently, this Journal published a study on the antecedents of adolescent drug use [1]. No mention was made of the impact of the media. If this were a one-time occurrence, I could understand. But it is not. A comprehensive review of adolescent drug use in a different pediatric journal did the exact same thing several years ago [2]. The media probably influence virtually every aspect of adolescent risky behavior that practitioners and parents are worried about—sex, drugs, aggressive behavior, obesity, eating disorders, suicide, school performance—yet research articles and review articles about any of these problems fail to mention it (including a recent position paper from our own Society on adolescent obesity) [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. International researchers are not immune to this problem either: a recent study to “evaluate the association of psychological, biological, social, and family characteristics” of teens with eating disorders symptomatology examined 2036 Portuguese adolescents; but not only did the authors not ask about media use, they never even mention the possibility that the media could be affecting teens' body self-image [8]. Even the highly respected Youth Risk Behavior Survey only recently added a mere two questions about media use—2 questions out of 89. The media may represent one of the single most important influences on adolescent attitudes and behavior that we know of, yet many researchers seem to be routinely ignoring its impact [3]. Why?
The apology that most researchers would offer is that their experimental model or their questionnaire did not allow for media influence. For example, in a recent Journal article, Cleveland et al. [1] used a Social Developmental Model (SDM) and a survey that does not seem to acknowledge media influence. “The SDM proposes that children learn patterns of behavior from socializing agents in four contexts: parents, peers, schools, and community” (p. 158). That sounds like a statement that could have been written in 1940, not 2008. Media have been accepted as being a major socializing influence since the U.S. Senate held hearings on media violence in 1954!
Perhaps there are other possibilities for this omission: researchers may simply not accept that there is a connection between media and any particular adolescent behavior. A well-known Toronto critic has been disputing the media violence research for decades, for example, despite the existence of more than 1000 research studies that attest to a connection between media violence and aggressive behavior [9], [10]. Social science research is difficult research—it is not like medical research. Trying to tease out media effects is like trying to study the effect of the air we breathe. A correlation coefficient of 0.3 in media research may be equivalent to a 0.8 in medical research [11]. Media are everywhere, and nearly every teenager spends an inordinate amount of time with them— an average of 6
hours a day, according to the most recent study [12]. Surely that amount of time should give researchers pause when they are considering “socializing agents.”
Researchers, like parents and primary care providers, may simply be “clueless” about media effects [13]. Or they may remember a gentler, kinder media when they were growing up. Or adding a media component might increase their already-limited budgets. Or they may lack the expertise to design a media component to their research. If the latter is true, there are several members of the Society for Adolescent Medicine who are experts in the field and would be willing to give advice: Dina Borzekowski, Alison Field, Michael Rich, even moi (notice the sly media reference to Miss Piggy).
The evidence that media contribute to adolescent behavior is substantial, and can no longer be ignored. Here is what every adolescent health researcher and practitioner needs to know about media effects:
Here's my advice: if you are a researcher and your model does not incorporate media questions, use a different model! Or add media questions of your own! The impact of media on adolescent behavior can no longer be ignored. Adolescent medicine practitioners need to ask two very simple questions of all teenagers they examine: (1) how much entertainment screen time do you spend per day? (2) Is there a TV set or Internet connection in your bedroom [44]? If you are a researcher attempting to study adolescent behavior, you must deal with the fact that the media have now become one of the leading “socializing agents” on adolescents today. The impact of media on adolescent behavior can simply no longer be ignored.
References
- . The role of risk and protective factors in substance use across adolescence. J Adolesc Health. 2008;43:157–164
- . Substance abuse in children: prediction, protection, and prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:952–960
- . Risky business: what primary care physicians need to know about the influence of the media on adolescents. Primary Care Clin Office Pract. 2006;33:317–348
- Preventing and treating adolescent obesity: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38:784–787
- . Associations between sexually experienced adolescents' sources of information about sex and risky sexual behaviors (abstract). J Adolesc Health. 2008;42:S4
- Predicting sexual initiation in a prospective cohort study of adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:55–59
- . Gaps in pediatricians' advice to parents regarding early childhood aggression. Clin Pediatr. 2006;45:23–28
- Determinants of eating disorders symptomatology in Portuguese adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:1126–1132
- . Media Violence and Its Effect on Aggression: Assessing the Scientific Evidence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2002;
- . Children, Adolescents, and the Media. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009;
- . Deceptive appearances: television violence and aggressive behavior—An introduction. J Adolesc Health Care. 1990;11:31–44
- Rideout V, Roberts DF, Foehr UG. Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8–18 Year- Olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation, 2005. Available at: http://www.kff.org
- . “Clueless”: why do pediatricians underestimate the media's influence on children and adolescents?. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1427–1431
- The influence of media violence on youth. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2003;4:81–110
- . Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:348–352
- Is office-based counseling about media use, timeouts, and firearm storage effective? Results from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e15–e25
- Watching sex on television predicts adolescent initiation of sexual behavior. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e280
- Sexy media matter: exposure to sexual content in music, movies, television, and magazines predicts black and white adolescents' sexual behavior. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1018–1027
- . Television viewing and risk of sexual initiation by young adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:375–380
- Parenting practices and adolescent sexual behavior: a longitudinal study. J Marriage Fam. 2008;70:97–112
- Does watching sex on television predict teen pregnancy? Findings from a National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1047–1054
- . The benefits of school-based condom availability: cross-sectional analysis of a comprehensive high school-based program. J Adolesc Health. 1995;17:184–188
- . Does condom availability make a difference? an evaluation of Philadelphia's health resource centers. Fam Plann Perspect. 1997;29:123–127
- Condom availability in New York City public high schools: relationships to condom use and sexual behavior. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1427–1433
- . Abstinence and safer sex: HIV risk-reduction interventions for African American adolescents. JAMA. 1998;279:1529–1536
- . Impact of a high-school condom availability program on sexual attitudes and behaviors. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:67–72
- The impact of condom distribution in Seattle schools on sexual behavior and condom use. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:182–187
- Condom availability programs in Massachusetts high schools: relationships with condom use and sexual behavior. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:955–962
- . Does the promotion and distribution of condoms increase sexual activity? Evidence from an HIV prevention program for Latino youth. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1952–1959
- . From Calvin Klein, to Paris Hilton and MySpace: adolescents, sex & the media. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2007;18:484–507
- Exposure to movie smoking: its relation to smoking initiation among US adolescents. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1183–1191
- Longitudinal study of viewing smoking in movies and initiation of smoking by children. Pediatrics. 2008;121:15–21
- . Tobacco, alcohol, and drug exposure. In: Calvert S, Wilson BJ editor. Handbook of Children and the Media. Boston, MA: Blackwell; 2008;p. 432–452
- . Do the media cause obesity & eating disorders?. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2008;19:431–439
- . Food for Thought: Television Food Advertising to Children in the United States. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2007;
- On the road to obesity: television viewing increases intake of high-density foods. Physiol Behav. 2006;88:597–604
- . Changes in sedentary behavior among adolescent girls: a 2.5-year prospective cohort study. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40:158–165
- Problem dieting behaviors among young adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:884–888
- . Body image, eating disorders, and the media. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2008;19:521–546
- . Eating behaviours and attitudes following prolonged exposure to television among ethnic Fijian adolescent girls. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:509–514
- Disentangling the relation between television viewing and cognitive processes in children with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comparison children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:354–360
- . The remote, the mouse, and the no. 2 pencil: the household media environment and academic achievement among third grade students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:607–613
- . Media and prosocial behavior in children and adolescents. In: Nucci L, Narvaez D editor. Handbook of Moral and Character Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2008;p. 537–553
- . First do no harm: why have parents and pediatricians missed the boat on children and media?. J Pediatr. 2007;151:334–336
PII: S1054-139X(08)00686-1
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.019
© 2009 Society for Adolescent Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
