Journal Home
Search for

Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 323-334 (April 2009)


View previous. 5 of 19 View next.

Decision-Making Authority and Substance Abuse Treatment for Adolescents: A Survey of State Laws

Tori Lallemont, J.D., M.P.H.ab, Anna Mastroianni, J.D., M.P.H.b, Thomas M. Wickizer, Ph.D., M.P.H.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 17 May 2008; accepted 19 November 2008. published online 24 February 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

State laws concerning decision-making authority for voluntary inpatient substance abuse (SA) treatment of minors may be a potential barrier to appropriate treatment. We sought to identify and classify relevant laws related to the provision of voluntary inpatient SA treatment to adolescents 12 to 17 years (minors) as an exploratory assessment to improve understanding of how these laws might affect treatment decisions.

Methods

In summer 2006, we conducted a survey of statutes, regulations, and legal cases in the 50 states and the District of Columbia regarding the authority of parents (or guardians) and minors to make treatment decisions for voluntary inpatient SA treatment.

Results

All 50 states have laws applicable to voluntary inpatient SA treatment for adolescents, and the laws vary significantly throughout the nation. If a minor and parent disagree about SA treatment, some states defer to the decision-making authority of the minor, whereas other states defer to the parent. Most significantly, the majority of states fail to specify whether the minor's or the parent's decision will control in the event of a conflict.

Conclusions

The lack of clarity in state laws regarding decision-making authority for voluntary inpatient SA treatment of minors may create a potential barrier to treatment for adolescents, especially those with more serious SA problems. This lack of clarity could lead to confusion among parents, adolescents, healthcare professionals, and treatment facilities, and ultimately could result in a failure to treat adolescents in need of medical attention. Policymakers should ensure that state laws clearly specify procedures to enable treatment if a conflict arises between adolescents and parents, including procedures to ensure that the due process rights of adolescents are protected.

a Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

b University of Washington School of Law, Seattle, Washington

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Thomas Wickizer, Ph.D., M.P.H., Department of Health Services, Box 357660, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7660.

PII: S1054-139X(08)00678-2

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.008


View previous. 5 of 19 View next.