Examining the Overlap in Internet Harassment and School Bullying: Implications for School Intervention

References 

1. Lenhart A, Madden M, Hitlin P. Teens and Technology: Youth Are Leading the Transition to a Fully Wired and Mobile Nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life; 2005;
2. Ybarra M, Suman M. Reasons, assessments, and actions taken: sex and age differences in uses of Internet health information. Health Educ Res. 2006;
3. Rideout V. Generation Rx.com: How Young People Use the Internet for Health Information. Kaiser Family Foundatation; 2001;
4. Wolak J, Mitchell K, Finkelhor D. Online Victimization of Youth: 5 Years Later. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children; 2006;
5. Ybarra M, Mitchell K, Wolak J, Finkelhor D. Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1169–e1177
   • CrossRef
6. Finkelhor D, Mitchell K, Wolak J. Online victimization: A report on the nation’s young people. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children; 2000;
7. Ybarra M, Mitchell K. Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;1308–1316
8. Hawker DSJ, Boulton MJ. Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000;41:441–455
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Sourander A, Helstela L, Helenius H, Piha J. Persistence of bullying from childhood to adolescence—a longitudinal 8-year follow-up study. Child Abuse Neglect. 2000;24:873–881
10. Kaltiala-Heino R, Rimpela M, Martunen M, et al. Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: school survey. Br Med J. 1999;319:348–351
11. Saluja G, Iachan R, Scheidt P, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for depressive symptoms among young adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:765
12. Nansel T, Craig W, Overpeck M, et al. Health Behavior in School-aged Children Bullying Working Group (Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:730–736
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Ybarra M, Mitchell K. Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver–child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. J Adolesc. 2004;27:319–336
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
14. Mitchell K, Wolak J, Finkelhor D. Trends in youth reports of sexual solicitations, harassment and unwanted exposure to pornography on the Internet. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40:116–126
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (133 KB)
    • CrossRef
15. Ybarra M. Linkages between depressive symptomatology and Internet harassment among young regular Internet users. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7:247–257
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
16. Ybarra M, Mitchell K. Prevalence and frequency of Internet harassment instigation: implications for adolescent health. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:189–195
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (111 KB)
    • CrossRef
17. Nansel T, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, et al. Bullying behaviors among US young people: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA. 2001;285:2094–2100
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Holt M, Finkelhor D, Kanotr G. Multiple victimization experiences of urban elementary school students: Associations with psychosocial functioning and academic performance. Child Abuse Neglect. 2007;31:503–513
19. Harris Interactive. Online Methodology. Available from: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/partner/methodology.asp (accessed July 5, 2006).
20. Schonau M, Zapert K, Simon LP, et al. A comparison between reponse rates from a propensity-weighted Web survey and an identical RDD survey. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2004;22:128–138
21. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79:516–524
22. Terhanian G, Bremer J. Confronting the selection-bias and learning effects problems associated with Internet research. Rochester, NY: Harris Interactive; 2000;
23. Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Jenkins-Smith H, et al. The advent of Internet surveys for political research: a comparison of telephone and Internet samples. Polit Anal. 2003;11:1–22
24. Taylor H, Bremer J, Overmeyer C, et al. The record of internet-based opinion polls in predicting the results of 72 races in the November 2000 US elections. Int J Market Res. 2001;43:2
25. Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Jenkins-Smith H, et al. Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples. J Environ Econ Manage. 2004;47:331–363
26. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or Internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Measure. 2000;60:821–836
27. Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R. A comparison of Web and mail survey response rates. Public Opin Q. 2004;68:94–101
    • CrossRef
28. Lenhart A. Cyberbullying and online teens. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2007;
29. Moesner C. In: Cyberbullying. vol. 6:New York: Harris Interactive; 2007;
30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2005. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:1–108
31. Finkelhor D, Hamby SL, Ormond R, Turner H. The Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: reliability, validity, and national norms. Child Abuse Neglect. 2005;29:383–412
32. Stata Statistical Software. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2006;Version Release 9.0