Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 41, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages S51-S58 , December 2007

Does Online Harassment Constitute Bullying? An Exploration of Online Harassment by Known Peers and Online-Only Contacts

Received 19 June 2007 ,Accepted 28 August 2007.

References 

  1. Wolak J, Mitchell K, Finkelhor D. Online Victimization: 5 Years Later. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children; 2006;
  2. Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence Juvenile Justice. 2006;4(2):148–169
  3. Moessner C. Cyberbullying. Trends Tudes. 2007;6:1–4
  4. Finkelhor D, Mitchell KJ, Wolak J. Online Victimization: A Report on the Nation’s Youth. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children; 2000;
  5. Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, et al. Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA. 2001;285(16):2094–2100
  6. Ybarra M, Mitchell KJ, Wolak J, et al. Risk and impact of internet harassment: findings from the second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):e1–e9
  7. Berger S. Update on bullying at school: science forgotten?. Dev Rev. 2007;27:90–126
  8. Smith PK, Cowie H, Olafsson RF, et al. Definitions of bullying: a comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences in a fourteen country international comparison. Child Dev. 2002;73(4):1119–1133
  9. Espelage DL, Swearer SM. Research on school bullying and victimization: what have we learned and where do we go from here?. School Psychol Rev. 2003;32(3):365–383
  10. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behav (in press).
  11. Raskauskas J, Stoltz AD. Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev Psychol. 2007;43(3):564–575
  12. US Census Bureau. United States Census 2000. Washington, DC: Author; 2005;
  13. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 3rd ed.. Lenexa, KS: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2004;
  14. Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Q. 2005;69(1):87–98
  15. Kohut A, Doherty C, Keeter S, et al. Survey Experiment Shows Polls Face Growing Resistance, But Still Representative. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center for The People & The Press; 2004;
  16. Finkelhor D, Hamby SL, Ormrod R, Turner H. The juvenile victimization questionnaire: reliability, validity and national norms. Child Abuse Neglect. 2005;29:383–412
  17. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Youth Self Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont; 1991;
  18. Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk?. JAMA. 1998;280(19):1690
  19. Bowie BH. Relational aggression, gender and the developmental process. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nursing. 2007;20(2):107–115
  20. Murray-Close D, Ostrov J, Crick N. A short-term longitudinal study of growth of relational aggression during middle childhood: associations with gender, friendship intimacy, and internalizing problems. Dev Psychopathol. 2007;19(1):187–203

PII: S1054-139X(07)00363-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.019

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 41, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages S51-S58 , December 2007

Article Tools