Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 40, Issue 2 , Pages 127-134, February 2007

Socioeconomic Differences in Adolescent Stress: The Role of Psychological Resources

  • Daniel M. Finkelstein, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Laura D. Kubzansky, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • John Capitman, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Central Valley Health Policy Institute, College of Health & Human Services, California State University, Fresno, California
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Goodman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, The Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts - New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Elizabeth Goodman, M.D., Department of Pediatrics, Tufts - New England Medical Center, NEMC Box 351, 750 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111.

Received 9 June 2006; accepted 2 October 2006.

Abstract 

Purpose

To investigate whether psychological resources influenced the association between parent education (PE), a marker of socioeconomic status (SES), and perceived stress.

Methods

Cross-sectional analyses were conducted in a sample of 1167 non-Hispanic black and white junior and senior high school students from a Midwestern public school district in 2002–2003. Hierarchical multivariable regression analyses examined relationships between PE (high school graduate or less = E1, > high school, < college = E2, college graduate = E3, and professional degree = E4), and psychological resources (optimism and coping style) on teens’ perceived stress. Greater optimism and adaptive coping were hypothesized to influence (i.e., mediate or moderate) the relationship between higher PE and lower stress.

Results

Relative to adolescents from families with a professionally educated parent, adolescents with lower parent education had higher perceived stress (E3 β = 1.70, p < .01, E2 β = 1.94, p < .01, E1 β = 3.19, p < .0001). Both psychological resources were associated with stress: higher optimism (β = − .58, p < .0001) and engagement coping (β = − .19, p < .0001) were associated with less stress and higher disengagement coping was associated with more stress (β = .09, p < .01). Adding optimism to the regression model attenuated the effect of SES by nearly 30%, suggesting that optimism partially mediates the inverse SES-stress relationship. Mediation was confirmed using a Sobel test (p < .01).

Conclusions

Adolescents from families with lower parent education are less optimistic than teens from more educated families. This pessimism may be a mechanism through which lower SES increases stress in adolescence.

Keywords: Socioeconomic status, Adolescent, Stress, Coping, Optimism

 

PII: S1054-139X(06)00390-9

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.006

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 40, Issue 2 , Pages 127-134, February 2007