Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 345.e1-345.e15, October 2004

Measuring sexual orientation in adolescent health surveys: Evaluation of eight school-based surveys

  • Elizabeth M. Saewyc, Ph.D., R.N., P.H.N.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Adolescent Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (E.M.S., G.R.B., C.L.S., L.H.B.)
    • McCreary Centre Society, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada (E.M.S., A.M.)
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. Elizabeth M. Saewyc, University of British Columbia School of Nursing, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5 Canada
  • ,
  • Greta R. Bauer, Ph.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Adolescent Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (E.M.S., G.R.B., C.L.S., L.H.B.)
  • ,
  • Carol L. Skay, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Adolescent Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (E.M.S., G.R.B., C.L.S., L.H.B.)
  • ,
  • Linda H. Bearinger, Ph.D., M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Adolescent Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (E.M.S., G.R.B., C.L.S., L.H.B.)
  • ,
  • Michael D. Resnick, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Adolescent Health & Development, Prevention Research Center, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (M.D.R.)
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Reis, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Public Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington, USA (E.R.)
  • ,
  • Aileen Murphy, M.A.

      Affiliations

    • McCreary Centre Society, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada (E.M.S., A.M.)

Accepted 3 June 2004.

Purpose

To examine the performance of various items measuring sexual orientation within 8 school-based adolescent health surveys in the United States and Canada from 1986 through 1999.

Methods

Analyses examined nonresponse and unsure responses to sexual orientation items compared with other survey items, demographic differences in responses, tests for response set bias, and congruence of responses to multiple orientation items; analytical methods included frequencies, contingency tables with Chi-square, and ANOVA with least significant differences (LSD)post hoc tests; all analyses were conducted separately by gender.

Results

In all surveys, nonresponse rates for orientation questions were similar to other sexual questions, but not higher; younger students, immigrants, and students with learning disabilities were more likely to skip items or select “unsure.” Sexual behavior items had the lowest nonresponse, but fewer than half of all students reported sexual behavior, limiting its usefulness for indicating orientation. Item placement in the survey, wording, and response set bias all appeared to influence nonresponse and unsure rates.

Conclusions

Specific recommendations include standardizing wording across future surveys, and pilot testing items with diverse ages and ethnic groups of teens before use. All three dimensions of orientation should be assessed where possible; when limited to single items, sexual attraction may be the best choice. Specific wording suggestions are offered for future surveys.

Key words:  Adolescent , Health surveys , Sexual orientation , Homosexuality , Bisexuality

 

PII: S1054-139X(04)00161-2

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.06.002

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 345.e1-345.e15, October 2004