Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 453-461, December 2004

Adolescent pregnancy intentions and pregnancy outcomes: A longitudinal examination

  • Cynthia Rosengard, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. Cynthia Rosengard, Rhode Island Hospital, Division of General Internal Medicine, Multiphasic Building, First Floor, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903 USA
  • ,
  • Maureen G. Phipps, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Community Health, Women & Infants Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  • ,
  • Nancy E. Adler, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  • ,
  • Jonathan M. Ellen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Accepted 6 February 2004.

Abstract 

Purpose

(a) To examine different methods of assessing pregnancy intention; (b) to identify psychosocial differences between those who indicate pregnancy intentions and those who do not; and (c) to examine the relationship between pregnancy intentions and subsequent pregnancy at 6-month follow-up in nonpregnant (at baseline), sexually experienced adolescent females.

Methods

Longitudinal cohort study of 354 sexually experienced female adolescents attending either a STD clinic or HMO adolescent medicine clinic in northern California. Student’s t-tests and regressions examined psychosocial differences between females who reported “any” and “no” pregnancy intentions. ANOVAs examined differences among different combinations of pregnancy plans/likelihood. Chi-square analyses assessed associations between baseline pregnancy intentions and subsequent pregnancy.

Results

Adolescents’ reports of their pregnancy plans and their assessments of pregnancy likelihood differed from one another (χ2 = 50.39, df = 1, p < .001). Pregnancy attitudes and baseline contraceptive use differentiated those with inconsistent pregnancy intentions (Not Planning, but Likely) from those with clear pregnancy intentions (Planning and Likely, and Not Planning and Not Likely) (Pregnancy Attitudes: F [2,338] = 68.96, p < .0001; Contraceptive Use: F [2,308] = 14.87, p < .0001). Suspected pregnancies and positive pregnancy test results were associated with baseline pregnancy intentions (Suspected: χ2 = 19.08, df = 2, p < .01; Positive Results: χ2 = 8.84, df = 2, p = .015).

Conclusions

To reduce adolescent childbearing we must assess pregnancy intentions in multiple ways. Information/education might benefit those female adolescents with inconsistent reports of pregnancy intentions.

Keywords:  Pregnancy intentions, Adolescent females, Attitudes, Intentions, Contraceptive use

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1054-139X(04)00096-5

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.02.018

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 453-461, December 2004