Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 182-189, September 2004

Testing the interaction between parent–child relationship factors and parent smoking to predict youth smoking

  • Elizabeth C. Tilson, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prevention, Detection, and Control Research Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA (E.C.T., C.M.M., I.M.L.)
    • Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA (E.C.T., C.M.M.)
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Elizabeth C. Tilson, M.D., M.P.H., Child Health Clinic B, Wake County Human Services, 10 Sunnybrook Rd., P.O. Box 14049, Raleigh, NC 27620-4049, USA.
  • ,
  • Colleen M. McBride, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prevention, Detection, and Control Research Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA (E.C.T., C.M.M., I.M.L.)
    • Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA (E.C.T., C.M.M.)
  • ,
  • Isaac M. Lipkus, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prevention, Detection, and Control Research Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA (E.C.T., C.M.M., I.M.L.)
  • ,
  • Richard F. Catalano, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Social Development Research Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (R.F.C.)

Accepted 23 September 2003.

Abstract 

Purpose

To examine if parental smoking modifies the association between parent–child connectedness and parental disapproval of youth smoking with smoking behavior among minority youth.

Methods

Baseline data from an urban Seattle, Washington neighborhood-based intervention trial to reduce risk behaviors among minority males and females aged 11–15 years were used to identify 428 minority youth-parent/guardian pairs. Parental smoking status, assessed by telephone interview, and youth reports of connectedness and parental disapproval, assessed by questionnaire, were tested in Chi-squared stratified analysis and logistic regression to predict youth smoking.

Results

The majority (86%) of the parents/guardians were the natural parent of the surveyed child (67% mother; 19% father). Parental mean age was 41 years, 54% reported household incomes less than $30K, and 26% were current smokers. Youth had a mean age of 13 years, 28% self-identified as African-American, 37% as Asian, and 35% as “Multiethnic”; 41% reported ever smoking, and 9% reported smoking within the past 30 days. Perceived parental disapproval of smoking was not associated with youth smoking behavior. Among youth whose parent did not smoke, those who reported low level of parent–child connectedness were two times more likely to report ever having smoked than those who reported high levels of connectedness. Among youth whose parent smoked, connectedness was not associated with youth smoking. The interaction between connectedness and parental smoking status and its relationship to youth smoking remained significant after controlling for covariates.

Conclusion

Overall, high levels of parent–child connectedness are protective against youth smoking. However, family connectedness may not protect children from becoming smokers when parents smoke.

Keywords:  Adolescence, Minority groups, Parent–child relations, Tobacco use

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1054-139X(03)00532-9

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.014

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 182-189, September 2004