« Previous
Next »
Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 33, Issue 5
, Pages 378-384
, November 2003
At what price? The current state of subject payment in adolescent research
References
- . The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates (A randomized study). J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:1117–1122
- Physician participation in research surveys (A randomized study of inducements to return mailed research questionnaires). Eval Health Prof. 1999;22:427–441
- What about money? Effect of small monetary incentives on enrollment, retention, and motivation to change behaviour in an HIV/STD prevention counseling intervention. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74:253–255
- . Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates (A meta-analysis). Public Opin Q. 1993;57:62–79
- . Weight of financial reward in the decision by medical students and experienced healthy volunteers to participate in clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38:443–446
- . Money for research participation (Does it jeopardize informed consent?). Am J Bioeth. 2001;1:40–44
- . An ethical framework for the practice of paying research subjects. IRB. 1989;11:1–4
-
.
Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research, 2nd edition.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1986;
- . Subject to payment?. JAMA. 1997;278:199–200
- . Treating research subjects as unskilled wage earners (A risky business). Am J Bioeth. 2001;1:53–54
- . Justice for the professional guinea pig. Am J Bioeth. 2001;1:51–53
- . On considering (what I might do for) money. Am J Bioeth. 2001;1:63–64
- . Research participation and financial inducements. Am J Bioeth. 2001;1:60–61
- . Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation (Description and an illustration). Public Opin Q. 2000;64:299–308
- . Money and the research subject (A comment on Grady). Am J Bioeth. 2001;1:65–67
- . How much are subjects paid to participate in research?. Am J Bioeth. 2001;1:45–46
-
.
The interactive effects of monetary incentive justification and questionnaire length on mail survey response rates.
Psychol Mark. 1994;11:483–492
-
.
The tea bag experiment (More evidence on incentive in mail surveys).
J Mark Res Soc. 1998;40:347–351
-
Kulka RA. The use of incentives to survey “hard-to-reach” respondents: A brief review of empirical research and current practice. Paper prepared for the Seminar on New Directions in Statistical Methodology, sponsored by the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, Bethesda, MD, 1993
- . “Due” and “undue” inducements (On paying money to research subjects). IRB. 1981;3:1–6
- . What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:198–203
PII: S1054-139X(03)00228-3
doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00228-3
© 2003 Society for Adolescent Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 33, Issue 5
, Pages 378-384
, November 2003
