Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 36-43, January 2003

Effects of pro- and anti-tobacco advertising on nonsmoking adolescents’ intentions to smoke

  • Diane M Straub, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. Diane M. Straub, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, 17 Davis Blvd., Suite 308, Tampa, FL 33606, USA.
  • ,
  • Nancy K Hills, M.A.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  • ,
  • Pamela J Thompson, M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  • ,
  • Anna-Barbara Moscicki, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Accepted 21 December 2001.

Abstract 

Purpose

To determine the effects of pro- and anti-tobacco advertising on nonsmoking adolescents’ intention to smoke in a single cohort.

Methods

All ninth graders at seven public high schools were invited to participate in a study on adolescent tobacco use; 59.0% participated (n = 1229; active positive parental consent required). Adolescents who self-identified as never having smoked even a puff of a cigarette (n = 512) completed a self-administered questionnaire that included questions on intention to smoke in the near future and tobacco advertising. Independent variables used to predict intention included exposure to, recognition of, and receptivity and attitudes toward pro-tobacco and anti-tobacco advertising. Potential confounding variables included gender, race/ethnicity, smoking influences (adult household members, siblings, and friends), socioeconomic status, stress, and depression. Data analysis used logistic regression.

Results

Demographics: 50.5% female, average age 14.9 ± 0.4 years old at baseline, and varied race. Those variables found to be significant predictors of intention to smoke included: (positive, or increased intention) recognition of brand of favorite advertisement, willingness to use or wear tobacco-branded products, stress, and having friends who smoke and (negative, or decreased intention) agreement with anti-tobacco advertising and having a live-in father who smokes.

Conclusions

Although anti-tobacco advertising has a protective effect, it was unable to counteract the effects of pro-tobacco advertising in the same cohort.

Keywords:  Adolescents, Advertising, Anti-tobacco, Media, Pro-tobacco, Smoking, Tobacco control

 

PII: S1054-139X(02)00451-2

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 36-43, January 2003