Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 343-353, October 2002

Predicting adolescent profiles of risk: looking beyond demographics☆

  • Janine M Zweig, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Janine Zweig, Ph.D., The Urban Institute, 2100 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20037
    • The Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA
    • ,
  • Stacey D Phillips, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • The Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA
    • ,
  • Laura Duberstein Lindberg, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • The Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA

Accepted 23 January 2002.

Abstract 

Purpose: To identify vulnerability and protective factors related to profiles of risk encapsulating the co-occurrence of health risk behaviors.

Methods: The current sample includes 12,578 high school students from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, a nationally representative sample. Four profiles of risk behaviors (sexual activity, general alcohol use, binge-drinking, cigarette use, marijuana use, other illicit drug use, fighting, and suicide) were compared separately by gender for factors in four domains: psychosocial adjustment, daily activities, school, and family. Data were analyzed using ordinary least-squares regression with follow-up contrast statements and multinomial logit regression.

Results: Results indicate that profiles are related to factors in the psychosocial adjustment, school, and family domains. Students in the lowest risk profiles reported consistently higher levels of protective factors and lower levels of vulnerability factors than students in any other profiles. Likewise, students in the highest risk profiles reported consistently lower levels of protective factors and higher levels of vulnerability factors than those in any other profiles. Students in profiles of risk distinguished by higher levels of suicidal thoughts and behaviors reported similar levels of vulnerability and protection as the highest risk profiles. Students in profiles consisting of sexually active, substance-using teens reported higher levels of protective factors and lower levels of vulnerability factors than both the highest risk profiles and the profiles distinguished by suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Conclusion: Program staff and policymakers should recognize that different profiles of risk behaviors are related to varying levels of vulnerability and protective factors which have potential implications for preventive interventions.

Keywords:  Adolescent risk-taking, Risk and protective factors, Gender differences

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

☆ Report prepared for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Planning and Evaluation, Contract HHS No. 100-99-003.

PII: S1054-139X(02)00371-3

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 343-353, October 2002

Article Tools