Journal Home
Search for

Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 413-423 (May 2009)


View previous. 2 of 17 View next.

Trends in Sexual Experience, Contraceptive Use, and Teenage Childbearing: 1992–2002

Jennifer Manlove, Ph.D.Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Erum Ikramullah, B.A./B.S., Lisa Mincieli, M.P.P., Emily Holcombe, B.A., Sana Danish, M.P.P.

Received 14 April 2008; accepted 11 September 2008. published online 13 November 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

To examine how cohort trends in family, individual, and relationship characteristics are linked to trends in adolescent reproductive health outcomes to provide a better understanding of factors behind recent declines in teenage birth rates.

Methods

We examine a sample of three cohorts of females and males aged 15–19 in 1992, 1997, and 2002, based on retrospective information from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. We identify how family, individual, and relationship characteristics are associated with the transition to sexual intercourse, contraceptive use at first sex, and the transition to a teen birth.

Results

Cohort trends and multivariate analyses indicate changes in family and relationship characteristics among American teens have been associated with positive trends in reproductive health since the early 1990s. Factors associated with improvement in adolescent reproductive health include positive changes in family environments (including increases in parental education and a reduced likelihood of being born to a teen mother) and positive trends in sexual relationships (including an increasing age at first sex and reductions in older partners). These positive trends may be offset, in part, by negative changes in family environments (including an increased likelihood of being born to unmarried parents) and the changing racial/ethnic composition of the teen population.

Conclusions

Recent increases in the U.S. teen birth rate highlight the continued importance of improving reproductive health outcomes. Our research suggests that it is important for programs to take into consideration how family, individual, and relationship environments influence decision-making about sex, contraception, and childbearing.

Article Outline

Abstract

Background

Family environments

Family environment hypotheses

Individual characteristics

Individual hypotheses

Relationship characteristics

Relationship hypotheses

Data and Methods

Measures

Analytic methods

Results

Bivariate results

Multivariate results

Discussion

Changes in family environments

Changes in first sexual relationships

Changes in individual characteristics

Limitations

Conclusions

References

Copyright

Although the U.S. teen birth rate increased by 3% between 2005 and 2006, the overall teen birth rate has decreased by almost a third since 1991 [1], [2]. National trends also show declines in sexual experience and increases in contraceptive use among teens [3], [4]. However, researchers, advocates, and policy makers disagree about whether the decline in teen birth rates is because of increases in abstinence [5] or to increases in contraceptive use or more effective method use among sexually active teens [6], [7], [8].

A better understanding of the changing context of adolescence may help explain trends in teenage childbearing and its proximate determinants (sexual experience and contraceptive use). Using data from males and females in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, we examine cohort trends in family, individual, and relationship characteristics and how these characteristics are associated with the timing of first sex, contraceptive use at first sex, and the transition to a teen birth. We hypothesize that changes in family environments, individual characteristics, and teens’ relationships and partners may contribute to changing reproductive health behaviors among U.S. teens.

Background 

return to Article Outline

Family environments 

A large body of research links family background factors with adolescent sexual behavior and teenage childbearing. Male and female adolescents from two-parent families initiate sex later than teens from other types of families, and are more likely to use contraception when they do have sex [9], [10], [11], [12]. Female adolescents whose mothers were teens at their first birth are at higher risk of teen childbearing than daughters of older mothers [9], [13]. Higher parental education is associated with a later timing of first sexual intercourse, greater contraceptive use at first sex, and a lower risk of teen pregnancy and teen births [9], [11]. Female adolescents whose mothers worked outside the home have sex at an earlier age; however, they are less likely to have a teen pregnancy compared to females whose mothers did not work [11].

Demographic trends show major changes in the composition of U.S. families since the early 1990s, which have implications for trends in reproductive health. For example, recent increases in education (especially among females) [14] and decreases in the likelihood that adolescents will have a mother who was a teen at her first birth [1] may lead to improved reproductive health in the next generation, as has been suggested by analyses of trends in teenage childbearing among females in the 1970s to 1990s [9], [10], [11]. In contrast, increases in single-parent families may counterbalance these trends [15].

Family environment hypotheses 

Improvements in maternal education and reductions in the percentage of mothers who were teens at birth will be associated with improvements in adolescent reproductive health outcomes across cohorts. Increases in nonmarital childbearing and single-parent families will lead to increased risk of teenage childbearing.

Individual characteristics 

Teens’ individual characteristics such as race/ethnicity and immigrant status are also associated with sexual behavior. Black adolescents initiate sexual activity earlier than white or Hispanic adolescents [11], [16]; however, they are more likely to use condoms [17], whereas Hispanics use condoms less consistently [4], [18]. White adolescents, however, are more likely than both black and Hispanic adolescents to use any contraceptive method [19], and have lower odds of experiencing a teen birth [11]. Foreign-born adolescents are less likely to transition to sex than adolescents born in the United States, but more likely to give birth once they initiate sex [20]. Among females, biological factors, including an early age at menarche, are associated with an earlier timing of sex [21], [22], and, according to some research, reduced odds of a teen birth [13], [23].

Individual hypotheses 

We hypothesize that changes in individual factors, including the changing racial/ethnic composition of the teen population, will be associated with trends in teenage childbearing. Specifically, increasing numbers of Hispanics and immigrants in the United States [24] will be associated with delays in sexual experience, reductions in contraceptive use, and potentially higher rates of teenage childbearing. Furthermore, declines in age at menarche among females [25] may contribute to earlier sexual initiation and a higher rate of teen births.

Relationship characteristics 

Characteristics of teens’ sexual relationships and partners are associated with their reproductive health behaviors. For example, a younger age at first sex and having an older sexual partner (especially among females) are associated with reduced contraceptive use[19], [26] and greater risk of a teen birth [27], [28]. Casual sexual partners (versus romantic or steady partners) are also associated with reduced contraceptive use at first sex [19], [26], whereas an extensive literature finds lower condom use and consistency in romantic relationships compared with more casual relationships [17], [29].

Relationship hypotheses 

We know little about long-term changes in the sexual relationships among teens. However, increased media and research attention has been given to casual or “hook-up” sex [30], [31], suggesting that sex with casual partners may be increasingly common among teens. Increases in casual relationships or older partners may be linked to reductions in contraceptive use and increased risk of a teen birth. In contrast, trends toward a later age at first sex would be linked to increases in contraceptive use and reduced likelihood of a teen birth.

Because both males and female are involved in reproductive health decision making that may lead to teenage childbearing, we examine whether family, individual, and relationship factors are associated with outcomes among both males and females. Some research, for example, suggests that family background factors and characteristics of early sexual relationships exert a stronger influence on sexual behavior among females, compared with males [28], [32], [33]. Thus, because of gender differences in reproductive health behaviors and their predictors, we examine factors separately for males and females.

Data and Methods 

return to Article Outline

We used data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) male and female data files for our analyses. The survey, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, was administered to 7,643 females and 4,928 males between the ages of 15 and 44, with oversamples of Hispanics, African Americans, and teenagers.

To examine trends over time, we created cohorts of teens aged 15–19 in 1992 (aged 25–29 in 2002), 1997 (aged 20–24 in 2002), and 2002, restricted to those who were living in the United States during their teenage years. Analyses of sexual experience used a sample of 3,516 female teens (1,114 in 1992, 1,273 in 1997, and 1,129 in 2002) and 2,563 male teens (600 in 1992, 858 in 1997, and 1,105 in 2002). (For the 1992 and 1997 cohorts, we created a measure of their teen interview date, calculated as the 2002 interview date minus 120 and 60 months, respectively. We created our sample of unmarried teens aged 15–19 in 1992, 1997, and 2002 based on this “interview date.” From our original sample of 3,795 females aged 15–19 in 1992, 1997, or 2002, we removed 267 who did not live in the United States at interview date and 12 with missing data on date of migration to the United States. From our sample of 2,761 males, we removed 198 who did not live in the United States. For analyses of contraceptive use at first sex and the transition to a teen birth, we eliminated those respondents who were not sexually experienced before age 20 or who had missing data on outcomes. The final sample of sexually experienced teens consisted of 1,869 females (646 in 1992, 681 in 1997, and 542 in 2002) and 1,359 males (364 in 1992, 453 in 1997, and 542 in 2002).

Measures 

We examined three outcomes in our analyses: transition to sex, contraceptive use at first sex, and transition to a teenage birth (for females only, because there were too few male teenage births). For the transition to sex outcome, we censored respondents who reached the cohort interview date without having had sex. Contraceptive use at first sex is a dichotomous measure of whether respondents reported using condoms, birth control pills, other hormonal method, injectable, intrauterine device, diaphragm, foam, sponge, suppository or other insert, and/or jelly. For the teen birth outcome, we censored those who did not have a child before the cohort interview date.

We examined individual, family, and first sexual experience characteristics as predictors of our outcomes variables. Individual characteristics include age, race/ethnicity, foreign-born status, and, for females only, early menarche (age 12 or younger). Family background characteristics include a four-level measure of respondent's family structure at age 14 (shown in Table 1), whether the respondent was born to married parents, mother's labor force status when the respondent was aged 5–15, whether the respondent's mother was a teenager at her first birth, and highest parental education. Characteristics of first sexual experience include age at first sex, the age difference between the respondent and his/her first sexual partner and relationship type at first sex, comparing those who were cohabiting, engaged, or going steady with those in more casual relationships (just friends, went out once in a while, just met, or other).

Table 1.

Sample characteristics among females and males ages 15–19 in 1992, 1997 and 2002

FemaleMale
1992199792 vs. 97200292 vs. 021992199792 vs. 97200292 vs. 02
Dependent variables
Ever had sex55.8%48.8%46.6%∗∗61.2%49.2%∗∗45.9%∗∗∗
Contraceptive use at first sexa61.8%65.7% 72.0%∗∗∗64.5%68.5% 78.7%∗∗∗
Nonmarital teen birth23.8%21.0% 18.5%
Nonmarital teen birtha32.7%30.8% 27.0%
Individual characteristics
Mean age16.916.9 17.117.117.0 17.1
Race/ethnicity
Hispanic12.7%13.9% 15.1% 15.0%15.6% 15.2%
Non-Hispanic white67.5%65.4% 64.0% 67.4%66.2% 64.2%
Non-Hispanic black15.1%14.5% 15.3% 12.5%13.2% 14.6%
Non-Hispanic other4.7%6.3% 5.6% 5.2%5.0% 6.0%
R was born outside of the U.S.7.6%7.4% 7.4% 8.2%7.5% 7.4%
Early age at menarche (younger than 12)24.2%20.3%25.3%
Family background characteristics
Family structure at age 14
Two biological/adoptive parents65.9%69.5% 63.3% 71.5%70.1% 68.5%
One biological and one adoptive/step parent13.4%11.5% 12.8% 11.4%8.3% 12.4%
Single biological parent11.2%12.1% 14.4% 9.3%14.6% 12.2%
Other9.5%6.9% 9.4% 7.9%7.0% 6.9%
R's parents married at R's birth85.9%84.8% 80.3%∗∗88.5%85.4% 84.3%
Mother's labor force status (when R ages 5–15) ∗∗∗
Full-time50.2%56.2% 59.3% 49.9%56.3% 57.9%
Any part-time23.1%19.5% 23.7% 25.0%23.2% 24.8%
Did not work for pay26.8%24.3% 17.0% 25.1%20.6% 17.2%
Mother was a teen at first birth36.4%32.5% 31.5%33.0%29.7% 25.0%
Highest level of parent education
Some college or more59.4%65.4% 65.2% 60.8%64.5% 69.4%
Average parent education(1–4)2.82.92.9∗∗2.92.9 3.0
Characteristics of first sexual experience
Average age at first sex15.015.1 15.3 14.714.7 15.0
Age difference with first partner
Partner younger 17.1%19.1% 16.7%
Partner same age 33.0%36.6% 36.5%
Partner 1–2 years older 32.5%27.5% 38.0%
Partner 3+ years older 17.4%16.8% 8.9%
Age difference with first partner
Partner same age or younger19.3%19.5% 19.2%
Partner 1–2 years older43.2%41.6% 44.5%
Partner 3–4 years older18.9%23.7% 23.5%
Partner 5+ years older18.6%15.3% 12.9%
Relationship with partner at first sex
Cohabiting, engaged, going steady with partner at first sex72.5%70.8% 78.4% 44.9%53.2% 50.3%
Just friends, went out once in a while, just met, other
27.5%29.2% 21.6% 55.1%46.8% 49.7%
N=1,1141,273 1,129 600858 1,105

p < .05

∗∗

p < 0.01

∗∗∗

p < 0.001.

a

Sexually experienced teens (N = 11,869 females and N = 1,359 males).

Analytic methods 

For bivariate analyses, we used chi-square and t-test analyses to examine cohort trends in predictor and outcome variables. In addition, we used chi-square analyses to compare the percentage who were sexually experienced and who used contraception at first sex, across categories of the independent variables. We used life table analyses to provide analyses of the probability of transitioning to a teen birth. In multivariate analyses, we used event history analyses to predict the transition to first sex and the transition to a teen birth; we used logistic regression analyses to model contraceptive use at first sex. All analyses were weighted and run in Stata to control for the complex sampling design of the NSFG [34].

Results 

return to Article Outline

Bivariate results 

Table 1 summarizes sample characteristics by cohort and gender. Among female and male teens, there was a decrease between 1992 and 2002 in the proportion who ever had sexual intercourse. During the same time period there was an increase in the proportion of teens that used a contraceptive method at first sex. There was only a nonsignificant cohort decline in the proportion of females with a teen birth, among all teens and among sexually experienced teens. Table 1 also shows increasing trends among males and females in the proportion having a mother who works full time and having a parent with at least some college education, and a decrease in the proportion having a mother who was less than age 20 at her first birth. Among females only, Table 1 shows an increase in average age and the proportion born to unmarried parents. Among males only, we see trends toward an increase in age at first sex, as well as a decrease in the proportion with a first partner 3 or more years older.

Table 2 presents bivariate associations between the predictor variables and the three outcomes, for females. All individual and family background characteristics were associated with sexual experience. Specifically, those who were born outside of the United States, lived with two biological or adoptive parents, and had a parent who completed some college or more were less likely to be sexually experienced, whereas a younger age, black race/ethnicity, early age at menarche, being born to unmarried parents, and having a mother who works full time or was a teen mother were associated with a greater likelihood of sexual experience. Most individual and family background factors were also associated with contraceptive use at first sex and a teen birth in the expected direction. Further, females who were younger at first sex and whose partners were 5 or more years older than them were less likely to use a contraceptive method at first sex and more likely to have a teen birth, whereas those in casual relationships were less likely to use contraception.

Table 2.

Probability of sexual experience, contraceptive use at first sex, and probability of a birth by individual, family, and first sexual experience characteristics, among teen females

Sexually experiencedContraceptive use at first sexTransition to a teen birth
Individual characteristics
R's current age∗∗∗
1522.6%58.3%4.9%
1636.4%61.2%11.5%
1751.4%69.3%12.3%
1865.8%70.4%22.7%
1975.8%66.1%29.0%
Race/ethnicity∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗
Hispanic46.5%50.0%52.8%
Non-Hispanic white48.8%70.9%21.3%
Non-Hispanic black61.4%62.1%39.3%
Non-Hispanic other45.2%68.4%46.0%
R's country of origin∗∗∗∗
Born in the U.S.50.9%67.6%28.3%
Born outside of the U.S.40.9%49.6%53.9%
Age at menarche∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗
12 years old or older47.6%69.3%26.4%
Younger than 12 years old58.5%58.8%42.7%
Family background characteristics
Family structure at age 14∗∗∗∗∗∗
Two biological/adoptive parents44.0%67.2%24.2%
One biological and one adoptive/step parent63.6%73.0%39.1%
Single biological parent59.9%63.0%42.0%
Other63.4%57.9%38.2%
R's parents marital status at R's birth∗∗∗∗∗∗
Unmarried62.2%60.7%49.7%
Married48.0%68.1%26.1%
Mother's labor force status (when R ages 5–15)
Full-time52.3%65.7%25.7%
Any part-time43.9%72.4%32.8%
Did not work for pay50.3%64.7%35.0%
Mother's age at first birth∗∗∗ ∗∗∗
20 years old or older44.4%68.6%21.6%
Younger than 20 years old61.3%63.0%43.0%
Highest level of parent education∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗
High school or less59.9%60.8%44.9%
Some college or more44.5%71.4%19.3%
Characteristics of first sexual experience ∗∗∗∗∗∗
Age at first sex
≤1456.5%49.8%
1568.4%30.2%
1670.1%29.7%
1773.8%18.8%
18–1978.6%6.5%
Age difference with first partner∗∗∗∗∗∗
Partner same age or younger69.9%26.9%
Partner 1–2 years older69.5%21.8%
Partner 3–4 years older68.6%29.4%
Partner 5+ years older50.8%56.8%
Relationship with partner at first sex ∗∗∗
54.2%33.7%
Cohabiting, engaged, going steady with partner at first sex 70.8%29.0%
Just friends, went out once in a while, just met, other
N=3,5161,8691,869

p < .05

∗∗

p < 0.01

∗∗∗

p < .001.

Table 3 presents similar findings for males. Several individual and family background characteristics were associated with sexual experience and/or contraceptive use in the expected direction. In addition, a younger age at first sex, having a partner 3 or more years older, and being in a casual relationship were all associated with reduced contraceptive use for males.

Table 3.

Probability of sexual experience and contraceptive use at first sex by individual, family, and first sexual experience characteristics, among teen males

Sexually experiencedContraceptive use at first sex
Individual characteristics
R's current age∗∗∗
1523.3%60.8%
1641.4%70.2%
1751.9%75.1%
1862.3%73.5%
1974.0%67.5%
Race/ethnicity∗∗∗
Hispanic66.6%59.5%
Non-Hispanic white45.4%73.3%
Non-Hispanic black67.8%74.7%
Non-Hispanic other41.9%65.4%
R's country of origin ∗∗∗
Born in the U.S.51.0%72.0%
Born outside of the U.S.55.9%54.6%
Family background characteristics∗∗∗
Family structure at age 14
Two biological/adoptive parents46.8%70.9%
One biological and one adoptive/step parent64.0%72.6%
Single biological parent58.2%71.9%
Other66.4%62.8%
R's parents marital status at R's birth∗∗
Unmarried61.8%64.1%
Married49.8%71.7%
Mother's labor force status (when R ages 5–15)
Full-time54.9%72.1%
Any part-time47.3%70.7%
Did not work for pay47.2%65.2%
Mother's age at first birth∗∗∗
20 years old or older46.7%73.5%
Younger than 20 years old62.7%64.6%
Highest level of parent education∗∗∗
High school or less59.1%66.5%
Some college or more47.4%73.5%
Characteristics of first sexual experience
Age at first sex ∗∗
<=1462.4%
1572.4%
1682.0%
1770.7%
18–1975.4%
Age difference with first partner∗∗
Partner younger71.6%
Partner same age75.4%
Partner 1–2 years older71.6%
Partner 3+ years older54.5%
Relationship with partner at first sex∗∗∗
Cohabiting, engaged, or going steady with partner at first sex64.4%
Just friends, went out once in a while, just met, other76.8%
N=2,5631,359

p < .05

∗∗

p < .01

∗∗∗

p < .001.

Multivariate results 

Table 4 shows results from multivariate analyses among females. Event history analyses of the transition to first sex show that being in the 2002 cohort (vs. 1992), Hispanic race/ethnicity, being born outside of the United States, having parents who were married at the respondent's birth, and having a parent who completed some college or more were associated with lower odds of sexual experience. In contrast, older age, an early age at menarche, living in a family structure other than two biological/adoptive parents, and having a mother who was a teen at her first birth were associated with greater odds of sexual experience. Columns 2 and 3 show results from logistic regression models predicting contraceptive use at first sex. In Model 1, 2002 cohort (vs. 1992) and higher parental education were associated with greater odds of contraceptive use among females, whereas Hispanic race/ethnicity and early age at menarche were associated with reduced odds. Model 2 added characteristics of first sexual experience to predict contraceptive use. All findings from Model 1 persisted. Additionally, an older age at first sex and being in a steady relationship were associated with greater odds of contraceptive use at first sex, whereas being born outside of the United States was associated with reduced odds.

Table 4.

Odds ratios from event history and logistic regression models predicting the transition to first sexual intercourse, contraceptive use at first sex, and transition to a nonmarital birth, among females

Transition to first sexContraceptive use at first sexTransition to a teen birth
Model 1Model 2Model 1Model 2
Cohort
1992(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)
19970.901.241.240.910.93
20020.77∗∗1.68∗∗1.58∗∗0.810.89
Individual characteristics
R's current age1.061.060.990.870.92
Race/ethnicity
Hispanic0.830.51∗∗∗0.51∗∗∗2.54∗∗∗3.02∗∗∗
Non-Hispanic white(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)
Non-Hispanic black1.040.840.871.66∗∗2.00∗∗∗
Non-Hispanic other0.821.031.042.92∗∗3.60∗∗∗
R was born outside of the U.S.0.65∗∗0.640.591.131.14
Early age at menarche (younger than 12)1.41∗∗∗0.67∗∗0.751.220.92
Family background characteristics
Family structure at age 14
Two biological/adoptive parents(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)
One biological and one adoptive/step parent1.56∗∗∗1.381.481.401.29
Single biological parent1.50∗∗∗0.910.941.62∗∗1.47
Other1.65∗∗∗0.740.881.671.22
R's parents married at R's birth0.79∗∗1.091.040.830.82
Mother's labor force status (when R ages 5–15)
Full-time1.100.870.900.840.84
Any part-time0.891.251.280.890.93
Did not work for pay(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)
Mother was a teen at first birth1.31∗∗∗0.980.981.47∗∗1.34
Parent completed some college or more0.74∗∗∗1.40∗∗1.300.54∗∗∗0.57∗∗∗
Characteristics of first sexual experience
Age at first sex1.17∗∗∗
Age difference with first partner 0.78∗∗∗
Partner same age or younger(1.00)(1.00)
Partner 1–2 years older1.030.99
Partner 3–4 years older1.211.23
Partner 5+ years older0.761.60
Cohabitating, engaged, or steady relationship with partner at first sex1.67∗∗∗1.76∗∗
N=3,5161,8691,8691,8691,869
Wald chi-squarea(DF)276.19 (16)∗∗∗194.73 (16)∗∗∗376.62 (21)∗∗∗
F statisticb(DF)5.18 (16)∗∗∗5.70 (21)∗∗∗

p < .05

∗∗

p < .01

∗∗∗

p < .001.

a

Model statistic for transition to first sex and birth.

b

Model statistic for contraceptive use at first sex.

In Model 1 of the transition to a teen birth, having a parent who completed some college or more was associated with lower odds of having a teen birth. Being nonwhite, living with a single biological parent or without any biological parent, and having a mother who was a teenage mother were associated with greater odds of a teen birth. Model 2 added characteristics of first sex and all findings from Model 1 persisted except for living without any biological parent. In addition, an older age at first sex was associated with lower odds of a teen birth, whereas having a partner who was 5 or more years older (compared with a same-age or younger partner) and being in a steady (vs. casual) relationship were associated with greater odds of a teen birth. In separate analyses, we ran Model 1 among the full sample of females (including those who were not sexually experienced) and found similar results (not shown here).

Table 5 presents analyses of sexual experience and contraceptive use among males. The first column shows that being born in 1997 or 2002 (vs. 1992) and having parents who completed some college or more were associated with reduced odds of first sex. Hispanic or non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity, living without two biological or adoptive parents, and having a mother who worked full time or was a teen mother at first birth were associated with increased odds of first sexual experience.

Table 5.

Odds ratios from event history and logistic regression models predicting the transition to first sexual intercourse and contraceptive use at firtst sex, among males

Transition to first sexContraceptive use at first sex
Model 1Model 2
Cohort
1992(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)
19970.72∗∗1.251.19
20020.63∗∗∗2.05∗∗1.91∗∗
Individual characteristics
R's current age1.031.000.92
Race/ethnicity
Hispanic1.71∗∗∗0.670.72
Non-Hispanic white(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)
Non-Hispanic black1.94∗∗∗1.241.58
Non-Hispanic other1.000.890.93
R was born outside of the U.S.0.850.600.62
Family background characteristics
Family structure at age 14
Two biological/adoptive parents(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)
One biological and one adoptive/step parent1.54∗∗1.021.05
Single biological parent1.37∗∗0.991.15
Other1.62∗∗∗0.760.87
R's parents married at R's birth0.961.501.34
Mother's labor force status
Full-time1.30∗∗1.131.25
Any part-time1.141.031.10
Did not work for pay(1.00)(1.00)(1.00)
Mother's age at first birth1.220.780.94
Parent completed some college or more0.821.061.00
Characteristics of first sexual experience
Age at first sex1.21∗∗∗
Age difference with first partner
Partner younger0.69
Partner same age(1.00)
Partner 1–2 years older0.86
Partner 3+ years older0.58
Cohabitating, engaged, or steady relationship with partner at first sex1.42
N=2,5631,3591,359
Wald chi-squarea(DF)/F statisticb(DF)214.20 (15)∗∗∗2.97 (15)∗∗∗3.99 (20)∗∗∗

p < .05

∗∗

p < .01

∗∗∗

p < .001.

a

Model statistic for transition to first sex and birth.

b

Model statistic for contraceptive use at first sex.

Among males, being in the 2002 cohort (vs. 1992) and having parents who were married at the respondent's birth were associated with greater odds of contraceptive use at first sex, whereas being born outside the United States was associated with reduced odds of contraceptive use. In Model 2, the 2002 cohort was still associated with greater odds of contraceptive use, but being born outside the United States and parent's marital status were no longer significant. Additionally, non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity and an older age at first sex were linked with greater odds of contraceptive use, whereas having a partner 3 or more years older was associated with reduced odds.

Discussion 

return to Article Outline

Our analyses show dramatic reductions in sexual experience and increases in contraceptive use for teens between 1992 and 2002, a trend that reflects other national data [3], [4]. Teen birth rates have also shown dramatic declines across the same time period, although our data show only a nonsignificant decline in teen births across the three cohorts. Differences between our estimates and Vital Statistics data may be because of smaller sample sizes and the age distributions of our cohort samples. Our analyses support hypotheses that changes in teens’ family environments and sexual relationships may have contributed to improvements in reproductive health behaviors.

Changes in family environments 

We found both positive and negative cohort trends in family environments. Specifically, our analyses support the hypothesis that cohort increases in parental education and declines in the likelihood of having a mother who was a teenager at first birth may help contribute to improvements in teenage reproductive health behaviors. Higher parental education is protective against an early transition to sex (among males and females) and with increased contraceptive use and reduced odds of a teen birth (among females), supporting previous research linking positive trends in maternal education to improvements in teen reproductive health [9], [10], [11]. In contrast, being born to a teenage mother is associated with an earlier timing of first sex among males and females and with increased odds of a teen birth among females, consistent with other research showing poorer reproductive health outcomes among children of teenage parents [9], [13]. Cohort declines in the likelihood of being born to a teenage mother may thus help explain improved reproductive health outcomes for males and females over time, which supports findings from one other study in the mid-1990s [9]. This finding shows that improving reproductive health outcomes in one generation may help improve outcomes among their adolescent children.

Our findings also indicate, however, that positive family trends may be offset, in part, by increases in nonmarital childbearing and single-parent families. Being born to unmarried parents is associated with a more rapid transition to sexual experience among females and with reduced odds of contraceptive use at first sex for males, whereas growing up in a family structure outside of two biological parents is associated with earlier sex for males and females and increased odds of a teen birth for females, supporting other research indicating the importance of family structure for reproductive health [10], [11]. Cohort increases in the percentage of children born outside of marriage and national data showing increases in single-parent families [35] may thus counterbalance more positive changes in family environments.

Changes in first sexual relationships 

As hypothesized, we found that changes in sexual relationships across cohorts may help explain improved patterns of reproductive health. For example, an older age at first sex is linked to increased contraceptive use for males and females and reduced odds of a teen birth for females, supporting previous research [19], [26], [27], [28]. Declines across the three cohorts in teen sexual experience and increases in the average age at first sex among males match national trends [3], [4] and support previous research finding that national changes in adolescent sexual activity influence trends in teenage childbearing [5], [6], [7], [9]. However, more recent data indicate that sexual experience among high school age teens may be increasing [36], which may lead to poorer reproductive health outcomes into the future.

Having an older sexual partner is associated with poorer reproductive health outcomes, including reduced contraceptive use among males and increased odds of a teen birth among females, which supports other research highlighting potential power differentials in these relationships [27]. The percentage of males with an older partner has declined across cohorts (females showed a nonsignificant decline), perhaps as a result of a later timing of first sex, because the youngest sexually experienced teens are most likely to have an older partner [28]. Expanding the public's awareness of problems associated with older dating and sexual partners may help improve reproductive health outcomes.

Despite media attention to hook-up sexual relationships, we found no cohort trends in casual relationships among teens. However, our research supports other studies showing a protective effect of having a steady (vs. casual) relationship for contraceptive use among girls, possibly because of greater communication about contraception in these more established relationships [37]. But, having a steady first relationship is also associated with greater odds of a teen birth, suggesting that the development of early serious attachments may sometimes be problematic for girls’ reproductive health [38].

Changes in individual characteristics 

We did not find cohort trends in the racial/ethnic composition of teen populations in our sample; however, Census data project dramatic increases in Hispanic and immigrant populations and small increases in African American populations [24], which may represent a challenge to further reducing teen birth rates into the future if these populations do not also show improvements in individual, family, and relationship environments. Our findings corroborate other research showing higher rates of teenage childbearing among Latinos and African Americans [11]. Specifically, black and Hispanic teen males have an earlier transition to sex, Hispanic females have lower odds of contraceptive use, and nonwhite females have greater odds of a teen birth. In addition, teen immigrant females and those of Hispanic ethnicity have reduced odds of sex, whereas foreign-born males have lower odds of using contraception. In contrast, although black males have an earlier transition to sex, they are also more likely to use contraception. These findings highlight the need for programs that address specific cultural issues in African American, Latino, and immigrant populations [39], [40]. In addition, although there were no uniform trends in the timing of menarche across the cohorts in this study, we did find that an early age at menarche among females is associated with greater odds of sex and reduced odds of contraceptive use, supporting other research linking early maturity to early childbearing [13], [23].

Limitations 

One study limitation is the fairly limited 10-year time period for this study, which may not capture some demographic shifts, such as long-term reductions in age at menarche [25] or even short-term declines in teenage childbearing [2]. Also, we only have information on teens’ first sexual relationships, and cannot examine whether subsequent teen relationship histories are associated with reproductive health outcomes. Our analyses of contraceptive use and teenage childbearing are restricted to sexually experienced teens, and factors selecting teens into early sexual experience may also be associated with contraceptive and birth outcomes. Finally, full multivariate models still show cohort differences in the transition to sex and contraceptive use, indicating that additional research is needed to better explain these cohort trends in reproductive health behaviors. However, these limitations are outweighed by the detailed retrospective information for males and females on critical predictors of reproductive health.

Conclusions 

return to Article Outline

We found that improvements in family environments, an increasing age at first sex, and changing partner characteristics help explain improvements in reproductive health outcomes among teens since the early 1990s. However, the recent increase in the U.S. teen birth rate shows the continued importance of improving reproductive health behaviors among teens. Our research suggests that it is important to tailor programs to the unique needs of varied teen populations and take into consideration how family, individual, and relationship environments may influence decision making about sex, contraception, and childbearing. Programs and policymakers should continue to focus on reducing high rates of teenage childbearing in this generation to help improve reproductive health outcomes among the next generation of teens.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary Data for 2006. National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 56, No. 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007;.

[2]. [2]Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: Final Data for 2005. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007;.

[3]. [3]Centers for Disease Control. United States All Years: Percentage of Students Who Ever Had Sexual Intercourse. 2007. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/yrbss/QuestYearTable.asp?path=byHT&ByVar=CI&cat=4&quest=Q57&year=Trend&loc=XX. Accessed March 2008.

[4]. [4]Abma JC, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, et al. Teenagers in the United States: Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and Childbearing, 2002. Vital Health Statistics Report 23, No. 24. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2004;.

[5]. [5]Mohn JK, Tingle LR, Finger R. An analysis of the causes of the decline in non-marital birth and pregnancy rates for teens from 1991 to 1995. Adolesc Fam Health. 2003;3(1):39–47.

[6]. [6]Santelli JS, Abma J, Ventura SJ, et al. Can changes in sexual behaviors among high school students explain the decline in teen pregnancy rates in the 1990s. J Adolesc Health. 2004;35(2):80–90. | CrossRef

[7]. [7]Santelli JS, Lindberg LD, Finer LB, et al. Explaining recent declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: the contribution of abstinence and improved contraceptive use. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):150–156. CrossRef

[8]. [8]Anderson JE, Santelli JS, Morrow B. Trends in adolescent contraceptive use, unprotected and poorly protected sex, 1991–2003. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38:734–739. | CrossRef

[9]. [9]Manlove J, Terry E, Gitelson L, et al. Explaining demographic trends in teenage fertility, 1980–1995. Fam Plan Perspect 2000. July/August 2000;32(4):166–175.

[10]. [10]Cooksey EC, Rindfuss RR, Guilkey DK. The initiation of adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior during changing times. J Health Soc Behav. 1996;37(1):59–74. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[11]. [11]Hogan DP, Sun R, Cornwell GT. Sexual and fertility behaviors of American females aged 15–19 years: 1985, 1990, and 1995. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(9):1421–1425. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[12]. [12]Lammers C, Ireland M, Resnick M, et al. Influences on adolescents’ decision to postpone onset of sexual intercourse: a survival analysis of virginity among youths aged 13 to 18 years. J Adolesc Health. 2000;26(1):42–48. | CrossRef

[13]. [13]Kahn JR, Anderson KE. Intergenerational patterns of teenage fertility. Demography. 1992;29(1):39–57. MEDLINE

[14]. [14]ChildTrends. Child Trends DataBank: Parental Education. Available at: http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/indicators/67ParentalEducation.cfm. Accessed 2008. Original data from Current Population Survey, March Supplements, March 28.

[15]. [15]U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Survey Reports: Living Arrangements of Children under 18 Years Old, 1960–Present. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html. Accessed March 2008.

[16]. [16]Blum RW, Beuhring T, Shew ML, et al. The effects of race/ethnicity, income, and family structure on adolescent risk behaviors. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(12):1879–1884. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[17]. [17]Sheeran P, Abraham C, Orbell S. Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(1):90–132. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[18]. [18]Sabogal F, Perez-Stable E, Otero-Sabogal R. Gender, ethnic and acculturation differences in sexual behaviors: Hispanic and non-Hispanic white adults. Hispanic J Behav Sci. 1995;17:139–159.

[19]. [19]Manning WD, Longmore MA, Giordano PC. The relationship context of contraceptive use at first intercourse. Fam Plan Perspect. 2000;32(3):104–110.

[20]. [20]Aneshensel CS, Becerra RM, Fielder EP, et al. Onset of fertility-related events during adolescence—a prospective comparison of Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white females. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(8):959–963. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[21]. [21]Miller B, Norton MC, Curtis T, et al. The timing of sexual intercourse among adolescents: family, peer, and other antecedents. Youth Soc. 1997;29(1):54–83.

[22]. [22]Posner RB. Early menarche: a review of the research on trends in timing, racial differences, etiology and pyschosocial consequences. Sex Roles. 2006;54:315–322.

[23]. [23]East PL, Khoo ST, Reyes BT. Risk and protective factors predictive of adolescent pregnancy: a longitudinal, prospective study. Appl Dev Sci. 2006;10(4):188–199.

[24]. [24]U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Interim Projections by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin, 2004. Available at: http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj. Accessed March 2008.

[25]. [25]McDowell MA, Brody DJ, Hughes JP. Has age at menarche changed? Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(3):227–231. | CrossRef

[26]. [26]Ford K, Sohn W, Lepkowski J. Characteristics of adolescents’ sexual partners and their association with use of condoms and other contraceptive methods. Fam Plan Perspect. 2001;33(3):100–105132.

[27]. [27]Leitenberg H, Saltzman H. A statewide survey of age at first intercourse for adolescent females and age of their male partners: relation to other risk behaviors and statutory rape implications. Arch Sex Behav. 2000;29(3):203–215. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[28]. [28]Manlove J, Terry-Humen E, Ikramullah E. Young teens and older sexual partners: correlates and consequences for males and females. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(4):197–207. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[29]. [29]Noar SM, Zimmerman RS, Atwood KA. Safer sex and sexually transmitted infections from a relationship perspective. In:  Harvey JH,  Wenzel A,  Sprecher S editor. The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004;p. 519–544.

[30]. [30]Stepp LS. Unhooked: How Young Women Pursue Sex, Delay Love and Lose at Both. New York: Riverhead Books; 2008;.

[31]. [31]Manning WD, Longmore M, Giordano PC. Adolescents’ involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Soc Sci Res. 2004;34:384–407. CrossRef

[32]. [32]Kowaleski-Jones L, Mott FL. Sex, contraception and childbearing among high-risk youth: do different factors influence males and females?. Fam Plan Perspect. 1998;30(4):163–169.

[33]. [33]VanOssMarin B, Kirby DB, Hudes ES, et al. Boyfriends, girlfriends and teenagers’ risk of sexual involvement. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(2):76–83. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[34]. [34]StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2005;.

[35]. [35]U.S. Bureau of the Census. Families and Living Arrangements: Living Arrangements of Children, Tables 1–4. 2006. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html. Accessed April 2008.

[36]. [36]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008;.

[37]. [37]Stone N, Ingham R. Factors affecting British teenagers’ contraceptive use at first intercourse: the importance of partner communication. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;34(4):191–197. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[38]. [38]Pistole MC. Preventing teenage pregnancy: contributions from attachment theory. J Mental Health Counsel. 1999;21(2):93–113.

[39]. [39]Sugrue M. Science Says: Effective and Promising Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs for Latino Youth. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy; 2007;.

[40]. [40]Kirby D. Emerging Answers 2007: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy; 2007;.

Child Trends, Washington, DC

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Jennifer Manlove, Child Trends, 4301 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 100, Washington, DC 20008.

 The research on which this article is based was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development through Grant R01 HD40830-01 and Grant R01 HD044761-03. The conclusions and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding agencies.

PII: S1054-139X(08)00420-5

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.09.006


View previous. 2 of 17 View next.