Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 42, Issue 1 , Pages 50-57, January 2008

Socioeconomic Disparities in the Prevalence of Work-Related Injuries Among Adolescents in the United States

  • Kimberly J. Rauscher, M.A., Sc.D.

      Affiliations

    • Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Kimberly J. Rauscher, M.A., Sc.D., Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Bank of America Building, Suite 500, CB #7505, 137 East Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
  • ,
  • Douglas J. Myers, Sc.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community and Family Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Received 8 March 2007; accepted 17 July 2007. published online 07 November 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

To explore whether socioeconomic disparities exist in the prevalence of work-related injury among adolescents ages 14–18 in the United States.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis of previously collected survey data was performed. Data were gathered in a single metropolitan high school and included work-related injury prevalence and two measures of socioeconomic status (SES): mother’s education level and working to support one’s family. Because of the high prevalence of our outcome, Cox regression was used to calculate prevalence ratios.

Results

Evidence of an inverse association between adolescents’ SES and prevalence of work-related injuries was found. A statistically significant dose–response relationship remained after controlling for hours worked per week, work history duration and race (Wald-test, 3 df, p = .039). A 30% drop in prevalence of work-related injuries was found between the lowest and highest level of mother’s education. In addition, adolescents who worked to support their families had an elevated prevalence of work-related injury (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [1.07, 1.46]). Race stratified results showed the associations between injury and both measures of SES were strongest among whites in this sample.

Conclusions

Results support the hypothesized protective effect of parental SES on the prevalence of work-related injuries among adolescents. More research is needed to test this association in a larger population and to understand the pathways that might explain it. Collection of SES measures in surveillance systems that gather data on work-related injuries is recommended to support new research on this topic.

Keywords: Adolescents, Teens, Health disparities, Inequality, Socioeconomic status, Work-related injury, Cox regression, Prevalence ratios

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1054-139X(07)00328-X

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.003

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 42, Issue 1 , Pages 50-57, January 2008