Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 72-81, January 2006

Abstinence and abstinence-only education: A review of U.S. policies and programs

  • John Santelli, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Heilbrunn Department of Population & Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. John Santelli, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue, B-2, New York, NY 10032.
  • ,
  • Mary A. Ott, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Section of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • ,
  • Maureen Lyon, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children’s National Medical Center and Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Jennifer Rogers, M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • American College of Preventive Medicine, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Daniel Summers, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Mt. Sinai Adolescent Health Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Rebecca Schleifer, J.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Human Rights Watch, New York, New York

Received 31 May 2005; accepted 14 October 2005.

Abstract 

Abstinence from sexual intercourse is an important behavioral strategy for preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and pregnancy among adolescents. Many adolescents, including most younger adolescents, have not initiated sexual intercourse and many sexually experienced adolescents and young adults are abstinent for varying periods of time. There is broad support for abstinence as a necessary and appropriate part of sexuality education. Controversy arises when abstinence is provided to adolescents as a sole choice and where health information on other choices is restricted or misrepresented. Although abstinence is theoretically fully effective, in actual practice abstinence often fails to protect against pregnancy and STIs. Few Americans remain abstinent until marriage; many do not or cannot marry, and most initiate sexual intercourse and other sexual behaviors as adolescents. Although abstinence is a healthy behavioral option for teens, abstinence as a sole option for adolescents is scientifically and ethically problematic. A recent emphasis on abstinence-only programs and policies appears to be undermining more comprehensive sexuality education and other government-sponsored programs. We believe that abstinence-only education programs, as defined by federal funding requirements, are morally problematic, by withholding information and promoting questionable and inaccurate opinions. Abstinence-only programs threaten fundamental human rights to health, information, and life.

Keywords:  Abstinence , Sex education , Policy

 

PII: S1054-139X(05)00467-2

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.10.006

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 72-81, January 2006