Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 162-169, March 2005

A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up

  • Sarah E. Wiehe, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Child Health Services Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Sarah E. Wiehe, MD, M.P.H., Children’s Health Services Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, 699 West Drive, RR 330, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
  • ,
  • Michelle M. Garrison, M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Dimitri A. Christakis, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Beth E. Ebel, M.D., M.Sc., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Frederick P. Rivara, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Received 22 January 2004; accepted 13 December 2004.

Abstract 

Background

Several systematic reviews of school-based smoking prevention trials have shown short-term decreases in smoking prevalence but have not examined long-term follow-up evaluation. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of rigorously evaluated interventions for school-based smoking prevention with long-term follow-up data.

Methods

We searched online bibliographic databases and reference lists from review articles and selected studies. We included all school-based, randomized, controlled trials of smoking prevention with follow-up evaluation to age 18 or 12th grade and at least 1 year after intervention ended, and that had smoking prevalence as a primary outcome. The primary outcome was current smoking prevalence (defined as at least 1 cigarette in the past month).

Results

The abstracts or full-text articles of 177 relevant studies were examined, of which 8 met the selection criteria. The 8 articles included studies differing in intervention intensity, presence of booster sessions, follow-up periods, and attrition rates. Only one study showed decreased smoking prevalence in the intervention group.

Conclusions

Few studies have evaluated the long-term impact of school-based smoking prevention programs rigorously. Among the 8 programs that have follow-up data to age 18 or 12th grade, we found little to no evidence of long-term effectiveness.

Keywords:  Smoking prevention , School , Youth

 

PII: S1054-139X(04)00460-4

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.12.003

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum: a systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up

    Sarah Wiehe, Michelle Garrison, Beth Ebel, Dimitri Christakis, Frederick Rivara
    Journal of Adolescent Health June 2005 (Vol. 36, Issue 6, Pages 539-540)

Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 162-169, March 2005