Journal Home
Search for

Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 162-169 (March 2005)


View previous. 18 of 19 View next.

A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up

Sarah E. Wiehe, M.D., M.P.H.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Michelle M. Garrison, M.P.H.cd, Dimitri A. Christakis, M.D., M.P.H.bd, Beth E. Ebel, M.D., M.Sc., M.P.H.bd, Frederick P. Rivara, M.D., M.P.H.bcd

Received 22 January 2004; accepted 13 December 2004.

Refers to erratum:
Erratum: a systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up
Sarah Wiehe, Michelle Garrison, Beth Ebel, Dimitri Christakis, Frederick Rivara
Journal of Adolescent Health
June 2005 (Vol. 36, Issue 6, Pages 539-540)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (50 KB)

Abstract 

Background

Several systematic reviews of school-based smoking prevention trials have shown short-term decreases in smoking prevalence but have not examined long-term follow-up evaluation. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of rigorously evaluated interventions for school-based smoking prevention with long-term follow-up data.

Methods

We searched online bibliographic databases and reference lists from review articles and selected studies. We included all school-based, randomized, controlled trials of smoking prevention with follow-up evaluation to age 18 or 12th grade and at least 1 year after intervention ended, and that had smoking prevalence as a primary outcome. The primary outcome was current smoking prevalence (defined as at least 1 cigarette in the past month).

Results

The abstracts or full-text articles of 177 relevant studies were examined, of which 8 met the selection criteria. The 8 articles included studies differing in intervention intensity, presence of booster sessions, follow-up periods, and attrition rates. Only one study showed decreased smoking prevalence in the intervention group.

Conclusions

Few studies have evaluated the long-term impact of school-based smoking prevention programs rigorously. Among the 8 programs that have follow-up data to age 18 or 12th grade, we found little to no evidence of long-term effectiveness.

Keywords Smoking prevention , School , Youth

a Child Health Services Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN

b Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

c Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

d Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Sarah E. Wiehe, MD, M.P.H., Children’s Health Services Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, 699 West Drive, RR 330, Indianapolis, IN 46202.

PII: S1054-139X(04)00460-4

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.12.003


View previous. 18 of 19 View next.